ANPCY
Price
$0.91
Change
+$0.02 (+2.25%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
48.56M
VRCDF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
22.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANPCY vs VRCDF

Header iconANPCY vs VRCDF Comparison
Open Charts ANPCY vs VRCDFBanner chart's image
ANGLE
Price$0.91
Change+$0.02 (+2.25%)
Volume$2.59K
Capitalization48.56M
VERICI DX
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$290
Capitalization22.99M
ANPCY vs VRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANPCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANPCY vs. VRCDF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANPCY is a Hold and VRCDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ANPCY: $0.91 vs. VRCDF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: ANPCY and VRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANPCY: 161% vs. VRCDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ANPCY: $48.56M vs. VRCDF: $22.99M
ANPCY [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $48.56M. VRCDF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $22.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANPCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRCDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANPCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRCDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ANPCY and VRCDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANPCY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ANPCY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ANPCY (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +1.68% price change this week, while VRCDF (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+2.36% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANPCY($48.6M) has a higher market cap than VRCDF($23M). VRCDF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. ANPCY (-32.593). VRCDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -10.35M vs. ANPCY (-15.72M). ANPCY has more cash in the bank: 31.8M vs. VRCDF (15.7M). VRCDF has less debt than ANPCY: VRCDF (0) vs ANPCY (2.34M). ANPCY has higher revenues than VRCDF: ANPCY (1.01M) vs VRCDF (0).
ANPCYVRCDFANPCY / VRCDF
Capitalization48.6M23M211%
EBITDA-15.72M-10.35M152%
Gain YTD-32.5930.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.01M0-
Total Cash31.8M15.7M203%
Total Debt2.34M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANPCY: Fundamental Ratings
ANPCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANPCYVRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANPCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIIHF3.03N/A
N/A
Citic Securities Co., Ltd.
KGDEF1.83N/A
N/A
Kingdee International Software Group Co., Ltd
TRCK0.21N/A
N/A
Track Group, Inc.
EOGSF2.66N/A
N/A
Emerald Oil & Gas NL
ANPMF2.11-0.05
-2.31%
Andean Precious Metals Corp

ANPCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANPCY has been loosely correlated with ANPCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANPCY jumps, then ANPCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANPCY
1D Price
Change %
ANPCY100%
+1.68%
ANPCF - ANPCY
56%
Loosely correlated
-34.12%
AHCO - ANPCY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
VRCDF - ANPCY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANSLY - ANPCY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVCRF - ANPCY
9%
Poorly correlated
+111.76%
More

VRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRCDF and AVNS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRCDF and AVNS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRCDF
1D Price
Change %
VRCDF100%
N/A
AVNS - VRCDF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
TNON - VRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
BITGF - VRCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPCY - VRCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
ITGDF - VRCDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More