ANKOF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
HL
Price
$5.01
Change
-$0.32 (-6.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
55 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ANKOF vs HL

Header iconANKOF vs HL Comparison
Open Charts ANKOF vs HLBanner chart's image
Angkor Resources
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$9K
CapitalizationN/A
Hecla Mining
Price$5.01
Change-$0.32 (-6.00%)
Volume$11.71M
CapitalizationN/A
ANKOF vs HL Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANKOF vs. HL commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANKOF is a Hold and HL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ANKOF: $0.07 vs. HL: $5.01)
Brand notoriety: ANKOF: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANKOF: 41% vs. HL: 98%
Market capitalization -- ANKOF: $7.72M vs. HL: $3.01B
ANKOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.72M. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANKOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANKOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than ANKOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ANKOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.98% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was -14.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than ANKOF($7.72M). HL YTD gains are higher at: 4.917 vs. ANKOF (1.538). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. ANKOF (-1.25M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. ANKOF (148K). ANKOF has less debt than HL: ANKOF (1.8M) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than ANKOF: HL (720M) vs ANKOF (0).
ANKOFHLANKOF / HL
Capitalization7.72M3.01B0%
EBITDA-1.25M124M-1%
Gain YTD1.5384.91731%
P/E RatioN/A1111.11-
Revenue0720M-
Total Cash148K106M0%
Total Debt1.8M663M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANKOF vs HL: Fundamental Ratings
ANKOF
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
470
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HL's Valuation (97) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ANKOF (99) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to ANKOF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANKOF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANKOF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (91) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ANKOF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to ANKOF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ANKOF (82) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to ANKOF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANKOF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than ANKOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

ANKOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANKOF and ITRG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANKOF and ITRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANKOF
1D Price
Change %
ANKOF100%
+1.54%
ITRG - ANKOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.05%
HL - ANKOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.00%
KLGDF - ANKOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - ANKOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
ANGPY - ANKOF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
-6.00%
PAAS - HL
85%
Closely correlated
-6.14%
AG - HL
81%
Closely correlated
-6.30%
AEM - HL
74%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
AGI - HL
73%
Closely correlated
-5.30%
RGLD - HL
72%
Closely correlated
-5.97%
More