It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESPR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANIP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESPR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ANIP (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +7.35% price change this week, while ESPR (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +9.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +68.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +80.82%.
ANIP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
ESPR is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
ANIP | ESPR | ANIP / ESPR | |
Capitalization | 1.9B | 410M | 463% |
EBITDA | 66.9M | -88.48M | -76% |
Gain YTD | 58.231 | -6.818 | -854% |
P/E Ratio | 49.06 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 674M | 260M | 259% |
Total Cash | 155M | 115M | 135% |
Total Debt | 623M | 298M | 209% |
ANIP | ESPR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 16 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESPR's Valuation (37) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANIP (93) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ESPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANIP’s over the last 12 months.
ANIP's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESPR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ANIP’s stock grew significantly faster than ESPR’s over the last 12 months.
ANIP's SMR Rating (93) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as ESPR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ANIP’s stock grew similarly to ESPR’s over the last 12 months.
ESPR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ANIP (37) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ESPR’s stock grew similarly to ANIP’s over the last 12 months.
ANIP's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as ESPR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ANIP’s stock grew similarly to ESPR’s over the last 12 months.
ANIP | ESPR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago69% | 19 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANIP has been loosely correlated with ORGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANIP jumps, then ORGO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ANIP | 100% | -2.81% | ||
ORGO - ANIP | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
DRRX - ANIP | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
AMRX - ANIP | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
COLL - ANIP | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
PRGO - ANIP | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ESPR and DVAX have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESPR and DVAX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESPR | 100% | -0.97% | ||
DVAX - ESPR | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
ANIP - ESPR | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.81% | ||
AQST - ESPR | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ALKS - ESPR | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.80% | ||
AMRX - ESPR | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
More |