It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANIP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANIP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ANIP (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +6.28% price change this week, while EBS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +8.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.07%.
ANIP is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
EBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
ANIP | EBS | ANIP / EBS | |
Capitalization | 1.43B | 120M | 1,192% |
EBITDA | 107M | -518.2M | -21% |
Gain YTD | 25.199 | -51.674 | -49% |
P/E Ratio | 79.85 | 17.73 | 450% |
Revenue | 487M | 1.02B | 48% |
Total Cash | 221M | 112M | 197% |
Total Debt | 286M | 860M | 33% |
ANIP | EBS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EBS's Valuation (56) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANIP (94) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANIP’s over the last 12 months.
ANIP's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ANIP’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBS’s over the last 12 months.
ANIP's SMR Rating (92) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as EBS (96) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ANIP’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.
ANIP's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as EBS (62) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ANIP’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.
EBS's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANIP (95) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew significantly faster than ANIP’s over the last 12 months.
ANIP | EBS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 4 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago73% | 5 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago71% | 12 days ago89% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANIP has been loosely correlated with ORGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANIP jumps, then ORGO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ANIP | 100% | +0.01% | ||
ORGO - ANIP | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
DRRX - ANIP | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.57% | ||
PRGO - ANIP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
EBS - ANIP | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EOLS - ANIP | 24% Poorly correlated | +6.73% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBS has been loosely correlated with HKMPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBS jumps, then HKMPF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EBS | 100% | N/A | ||
HKMPF - EBS | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
AMRX - EBS | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
HROW - EBS | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.74% | ||
SIGA - EBS | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
ANIP - EBS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.01% | ||
More |