ANGVF
Price
$0.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
APGOF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.03 (-17.65%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

ANGVF vs APGOF

Header iconANGVF vs APGOF Comparison
Open Charts ANGVF vs APGOFBanner chart's image
Angus Gold
Price$0.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.04K
CapitalizationN/A
Apollo Silver
Price$0.14
Change-$0.03 (-17.65%)
Volume$716.01K
CapitalizationN/A
ANGVF vs APGOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
APGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANGVF vs. APGOF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANGVF is a Hold and APGOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ANGVF: $0.35 vs. APGOF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: ANGVF and APGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANGVF: 14% vs. APGOF: 318%
Market capitalization -- ANGVF: $28.16M vs. APGOF: $15.79M
ANGVF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $28.16M. APGOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANGVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileAPGOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ANGVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • APGOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, APGOF is a better buy in the long-term than ANGVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APGOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • APGOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ANGVF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.28% price change this week, while APGOF (@Precious Metals) price change was -31.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANGVF($28.2M) has a higher market cap than APGOF($15.8M). APGOF YTD gains are higher at: 51.978 vs. ANGVF (-13.168). ANGVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.16M vs. APGOF (-9.21M). APGOF has more cash in the bank: 7.29M vs. ANGVF (6.7M). ANGVF (0) and APGOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ANGVFAPGOFANGVF / APGOF
Capitalization28.2M15.8M178%
EBITDA-8.16M-9.21M89%
Gain YTD-13.16851.978-25%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.7M7.29M92%
Total DebtN/A223K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APGOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

ANGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANGVF and ALKEF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANGVF and ALKEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANGVF
1D Price
Change %
ANGVF100%
-8.80%
ALKEF - ANGVF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APGOF - ANGVF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.85%
ARGTF - ANGVF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
APRAF - ANGVF
2%
Poorly correlated
-13.38%
ANKOF - ANGVF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

APGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APGOF has been loosely correlated with AYASF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APGOF jumps, then AYASF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APGOF
1D Price
Change %
APGOF100%
-2.85%
AYASF - APGOF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
CGLCF - APGOF
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
ORZCF - APGOF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
GLGDF - APGOF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
HL - APGOF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More