Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANFVX vs SSGSX
ANFVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANFVX vs SSGSX
Virtus NFJ Small-Cap Value R6
Price$15.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.09M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
ANFVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANFVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANFVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. ANFVX (261M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ANFVX: SSGSX (0.51) vs ANFVX (0.22). ANFVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ANFVX (12 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than ANFVX (0.82). ANFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANFVX: SSGSX (2500) vs ANFVX (2500000). ANFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.13 vs. SSGSX (-8.77). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.49 vs. ANFVX (20.85).
| ANFVX | SSGSX | ANFVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.26 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.26 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.510 | -2.283 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 2500 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261M | 5.73B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.51 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.13 | -8.77 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.84 | -2.14 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.85 | 23.49 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.84 | 18.39 | -211% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers