ANF
Price
$93.82
Change
-$3.50 (-3.60%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.47B
10 days until earnings call
GLFGF
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.18 (+81.82%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
99.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANF vs GLFGF

Header iconANF vs GLFGF Comparison
Open Charts ANF vs GLFGFBanner chart's image
Abercrombie & Fitch
Price$93.82
Change-$3.50 (-3.60%)
Volume$2.57M
Capitalization4.47B
GLOBAL FASHION GROUP SA
Price$0.40
Change+$0.18 (+81.82%)
Volume$142.8K
Capitalization99.77M
ANF vs GLFGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLFGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANF vs. GLFGF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANF is a Hold and GLFGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ANF: $93.82 vs. GLFGF: $0.40)
Brand notoriety: ANF: Notable vs. GLFGF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANF: 133% vs. GLFGF: 352%
Market capitalization -- ANF: $4.47B vs. GLFGF: $99.77M
ANF [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $4.47B. GLFGF’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $99.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $158.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $14.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGLFGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GLFGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANF is a better buy in the long-term than GLFGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLFGF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLFGF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLFGF is a better buy in the short-term than ANF.

Price Growth

ANF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -9.01% price change this week, while GLFGF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

ANF is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+2.44% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANF($4.47B) has a higher market cap than GLFGF($99.8M). GLFGF YTD gains are higher at: 80.273 vs. ANF (-37.232). ANF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 904M vs. GLFGF (-6.3M). ANF has more cash in the bank: 608M vs. GLFGF (211M). GLFGF has less debt than ANF: GLFGF (103M) vs ANF (1.03B). ANF has higher revenues than GLFGF: ANF (5.03B) vs GLFGF (744M).
ANFGLFGFANF / GLFGF
Capitalization4.47B99.8M4,479%
EBITDA904M-6.3M-14,349%
Gain YTD-37.23280.273-46%
P/E Ratio9.25N/A-
Revenue5.03B744M675%
Total Cash608M211M288%
Total Debt1.03B103M996%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANF: Fundamental Ratings
ANF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56
SMR RATING
1..100
20
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANFGLFGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLFGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFUVX33.67-0.05
-0.15%
DFA US Large Cap Value III
ABCCX12.31-0.02
-0.16%
American Beacon Balanced C
RMFFX60.76-0.15
-0.25%
American Funds American Mutual R5
FNKFX16.57-0.07
-0.42%
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6
MUOSX32.96-0.15
-0.45%
Morgan Stanley Instl US Core R6

ANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANF has been loosely correlated with AEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANF jumps, then AEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANF
1D Price
Change %
ANF100%
-3.60%
AEO - ANF
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
GAP - ANF
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
BKE - ANF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
ZUMZ - ANF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
SCVL - ANF
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

GLFGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLFGF has been loosely correlated with LULU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLFGF jumps, then LULU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLFGF
1D Price
Change %
GLFGF100%
N/A
LULU - GLFGF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
ANF - GLFGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
LVLU - GLFGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
BIRD - GLFGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
VSCO - GLFGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
More