| ANEW | IWF | ANEW / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 13.987 | 17.366 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 7.63M | 123B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.18 | 250% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 13.00 | 269% |
| Yield | 0.95 | 0.34 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| ANEW | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSEE | 57.08 | -0.69 | -1.19% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emer Mkt Eq ETF | |||
| PJFV | 81.16 | -1.29 | -1.56% |
| PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF | |||
| XMHQ | 101.06 | -2.13 | -2.06% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | |||
| FNGS | 70.39 | -1.61 | -2.24% |
| MicroSectors™ FANG+™ ETN | |||
| SMCY | 10.07 | -0.93 | -8.45% |
| YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANEW has been loosely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANEW jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANEW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANEW | 100% | N/A | ||
| TRMB - ANEW | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.29% | ||
| PCOR - ANEW | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| HOOD - ANEW | 52% Loosely correlated | -8.61% | ||
| OLED - ANEW | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| GEN - ANEW | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -2.12% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||