ANET vs QUBT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANET is a Hold and QUBT is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQUBT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ANET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- QUBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANET’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUBT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ANET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QUBT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ANET (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а -6.61% price change this week, while QUBT (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +146.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
ANET is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
QUBT is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (+3.49% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| ANET | QUBT | ANET / QUBT | |
| Capitalization | 90.7B | 75.1M | 120,772% |
| EBITDA | 2.33B | -35.07M | -6,639% |
| Gain YTD | 67.789 | 191.315 | 35% |
| P/E Ratio | 45.55 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.86B | 284K | 2,063,380% |
| Total Cash | 5.01B | 7.38M | 67,868% |
| Total Debt | 48M | 5.67M | 847% |
ANET | QUBT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ANET's Valuation (87) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as QUBT (91) in the null industry. This means that ANET’s stock grew similarly to QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
ANET's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for QUBT (100) in the null industry. This means that ANET’s stock grew significantly faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
ANET's SMR Rating (29) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for QUBT (97) in the null industry. This means that ANET’s stock grew significantly faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ANET (43) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that QUBT’s stock grew similarly to ANET’s over the last 12 months.
ANET's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QUBT (100) in the null industry. This means that ANET’s stock grew somewhat faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
| ANET | QUBT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 0% | 7 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
ANET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANET has been loosely correlated with WDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANET jumps, then WDC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANET | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| WDC - ANET | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| PSTG - ANET | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| CRSR - ANET | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| RGTI - ANET | 30% Poorly correlated | +14.09% | ||
| IONQ - ANET | 29% Poorly correlated | +16.30% | ||
More | ||||
QUBT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been loosely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUBT | 100% | +92.75% | ||
| RGTI - QUBT | 48% Loosely correlated | +14.09% | ||
| IONQ - QUBT | 46% Loosely correlated | +16.30% | ||
| QBTS - QUBT | 43% Loosely correlated | +15.58% | ||
| NNDM - QUBT | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
| ANET - QUBT | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||