Advertisement
ANET vs CAJPY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANET is a Buy and CAJPY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCAJPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ANET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CAJPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANET’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CAJPY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ANET’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CAJPY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ANET (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +2.24% price change this week, while CAJPY (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
ANET is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
CAJPY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (-0.43% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| ANET | CAJPY | ANET / CAJPY | |
| Capitalization | 90.7B | 26.1B | 348% |
| EBITDA | 2.33B | 616B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 3.393 | -16.016 | -21% |
| P/E Ratio | 45.55 | 14.06 | 324% |
| Revenue | 5.86B | 4.15T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 5.01B | 545B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 48M | 663B | 0% |
ANET | CAJPY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAJPY's Valuation (7) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANET (84) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than ANET’s over the last 12 months.
ANET's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CAJPY (35) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that ANET’s stock grew similarly to CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.
ANET's SMR Rating (29) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAJPY (69) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that ANET’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.
ANET's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAJPY (80) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that ANET’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as ANET (42) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew similarly to ANET’s over the last 12 months.
| ANET | CAJPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
ANET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANET has been loosely correlated with PSTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANET jumps, then PSTG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANET | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| PSTG - ANET | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| DELL - ANET | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| WDC - ANET | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| NTAP - ANET | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| STX - ANET | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||
CAJPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CAJPY and SEKEY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAJPY and SEKEY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAJPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAJPY | 100% | -2.04% | ||
| SEKEY - CAJPY | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.57% | ||
| STX - CAJPY | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
| NTAP - CAJPY | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| ANET - CAJPY | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| NNDM - CAJPY | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
More | ||||