Advertisement
ANCTF vs FLWS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANCTF is a Buy and FLWS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANCTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ANCTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANCTF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLWS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ANCTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FLWS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ANCTF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +4.93% price change this week, while FLWS (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
ANCTF is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2026.
FLWS is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-1.40% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| ANCTF | FLWS | ANCTF / FLWS | |
| Capitalization | 56.4B | 262M | 21,527% |
| EBITDA | 6.27B | -164.71M | -3,807% |
| Gain YTD | 11.475 | 4.071 | 282% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.15 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 72.4B | 1.59B | 4,568% |
| Total Cash | 2.17B | 193M | 1,122% |
| Total Debt | 15.6B | 258M | 6,047% |
ANCTF | FLWS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ANCTF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as FLWS (84) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that ANCTF’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
ANCTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that ANCTF’s stock grew significantly faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
ANCTF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (97) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that ANCTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
ANCTF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FLWS (61) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that ANCTF’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANCTF (35) in the null industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANCTF’s over the last 12 months.
| ANCTF | FLWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 54% | 10 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 75% |
Advertisement
ANCTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ANCTF and WFAFY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANCTF and WFAFY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANCTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANCTF | 100% | +2.55% | ||
| WFAFY - ANCTF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
| FLWS - ANCTF | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.76% | ||
| CASY - ANCTF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| WOOF - ANCTF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
| PAG - ANCTF | 24% Poorly correlated | +5.36% | ||
More | ||||
FLWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLWS | 100% | -3.76% | ||
| RUSHA - FLWS | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| HVT - FLWS | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| LOW - FLWS | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| CPRT - FLWS | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| FND - FLWS | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.46% | ||
More | ||||