AN
Price
$189.62
Change
-$2.34 (-1.22%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.9B
32 days until earnings call
RUSHB
Price
$50.31
Change
-$2.12 (-4.04%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AN vs RUSHB

Header iconAN vs RUSHB Comparison
Open Charts AN vs RUSHBBanner chart's image
AutoNation
Price$189.62
Change-$2.34 (-1.22%)
Volume$267.22K
Capitalization6.9B
Rush Enterprises
Price$50.31
Change-$2.12 (-4.04%)
Volume$102.7K
Capitalization4.12B
AN vs RUSHB Comparison Chart
Loading...
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AN vs. RUSHB commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AN is a Buy and RUSHB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AN: $189.62 vs. RUSHB: $50.31)
Brand notoriety: AN and RUSHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AN: 59% vs. RUSHB: 311%
Market capitalization -- AN: $6.9B vs. RUSHB: $4.12B
AN [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.9B. RUSHB’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, AN is a better buy in the long-term than RUSHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUSHB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AN is a better buy in the short-term than RUSHB.

Price Growth

AN (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +1.36% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Specialty Stores) price change was -4.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

AN is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.05% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AN($6.9B) has a higher market cap than RUSHB($4.12B). RUSHB has higher P/E ratio than AN: RUSHB (12.65) vs AN (7.25). AN YTD gains are higher at: 11.646 vs. RUSHB (-6.980). AN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.9B vs. RUSHB (737M). RUSHB has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. AN (60.8M). RUSHB has less debt than AN: RUSHB (1.81B) vs AN (8.03B). AN has higher revenues than RUSHB: AN (26.9B) vs RUSHB (7.93B).
ANRUSHBAN / RUSHB
Capitalization6.9B4.12B168%
EBITDA1.9B737M257%
Gain YTD11.646-6.980-167%
P/E Ratio7.2512.6557%
Revenue26.9B7.93B339%
Total Cash60.8M184M33%
Total Debt8.03B1.81B444%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AN vs RUSHB: Fundamental Ratings
AN
RUSHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
913
SMR RATING
1..100
3456
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1516
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHB's Valuation (24) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (72) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (13) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

AN's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (56) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (60) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

AN's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANRUSHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THTA14.97-0.05
-0.33%
SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF
VMBS45.69-0.18
-0.39%
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Secs ETF
EOS23.36-0.10
-0.43%
Eaton Vance Enhance Equity Income Fund II
SIXJ30.98-0.23
-0.75%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Jan/Jul ETF
EELV25.85-0.26
-1.00%
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Vol ETF

AN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AN has been closely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AN jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AN
1D Price
Change %
AN100%
-1.22%
ABG - AN
83%
Closely correlated
-3.00%
GPI - AN
81%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
PAG - AN
79%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
SAH - AN
78%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
LAD - AN
75%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
More

RUSHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHB
1D Price
Change %
RUSHB100%
-4.04%
RUSHA - RUSHB
87%
Closely correlated
-2.85%
LAD - RUSHB
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
ABG - RUSHB
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
AN - RUSHB
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
GPI - RUSHB
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
More