AN
Price
$206.18
Change
-$1.82 (-0.88%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
7.77B
68 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$56.37
Change
-$0.98 (-1.71%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.38B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AN vs RUSHA

Header iconAN vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts AN vs RUSHABanner chart's image
AutoNation
Price$206.18
Change-$1.82 (-0.88%)
Volume$339.76K
Capitalization7.77B
Rush Enterprises
Price$56.37
Change-$0.98 (-1.71%)
Volume$264.43K
Capitalization4.38B
AN vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AN vs. RUSHA commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AN is a Hold and RUSHA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AN: $206.18 vs. RUSHA: $56.37)
Brand notoriety: AN and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AN: 71% vs. RUSHA: 60%
Market capitalization -- AN: $7.77B vs. RUSHA: $4.38B
AN [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $7.77B. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $48.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than AN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AN and RUSHA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AN (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +5.07% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +2.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +3.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

AN is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (+3.46% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AN($7.77B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($4.38B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than AN: RUSHA (16.06) vs AN (12.94). AN YTD gains are higher at: 21.397 vs. RUSHA (3.949). RUSHA has less debt than AN: RUSHA (1.73B) vs AN (9.31B).
ANRUSHAAN / RUSHA
Capitalization7.77B4.38B177%
EBITDA1.57BN/A-
Gain YTD21.3973.949542%
P/E Ratio12.9416.0681%
Revenue27.5BN/A-
Total Cash62.9MN/A-
Total Debt9.31B1.73B538%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AN vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
AN
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
871
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
916
SMR RATING
1..100
3657
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1933
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1185

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (81) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

AN's SMR Rating (36) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as AN (49) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (33) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIERX46.020.49
+1.08%
BNY Mellon International Core Equity I
FMCMX45.91-0.03
-0.07%
American Funds AMCAP 529-F-3
GABPX49.93-0.11
-0.22%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income P
FRSGX40.89-0.13
-0.32%
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth A
KNPCX101.71-2.43
-2.33%
Kinetics Paradigm Adv C

AN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AN has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AN jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AN
1D Price
Change %
AN100%
-0.88%
GPI - AN
84%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
SAH - AN
82%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
ABG - AN
82%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
LAD - AN
82%
Closely correlated
-2.34%
PAG - AN
81%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-1.71%
RUSHB - RUSHA
85%
Closely correlated
-2.01%
AN - RUSHA
70%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
GPI - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
ABG - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
PAG - RUSHA
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
More