AN
Price
$198.89
Change
+$2.13 (+1.08%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.9B
3 days until earnings call
RMBL
Price
$2.48
Change
-$0.01 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
227.41M
15 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AN vs RMBL

Header iconAN vs RMBL Comparison
Open Charts AN vs RMBLBanner chart's image
AutoNation
Price$198.89
Change+$2.13 (+1.08%)
Volume$388.35K
Capitalization6.9B
RumbleOn
Price$2.48
Change-$0.01 (-0.40%)
Volume$43.04K
Capitalization227.41M
AN vs RMBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AN vs. RMBL commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AN is a Hold and RMBL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (AN: $198.89 vs. RMBL: $2.48)
Brand notoriety: AN and RMBL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AN: 91% vs. RMBL: 25%
Market capitalization -- AN: $6.9B vs. RMBL: $227.41M
AN [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.9B. RMBL’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $227.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RMBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AN is a better buy in the long-term than RMBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMBL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMBL is a better buy in the short-term than AN.

Price Growth

AN (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -7.21% price change this week, while RMBL (@Specialty Stores) price change was -10.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

AN is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

RMBL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.65% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AN($6.9B) has a higher market cap than RMBL($227M). AN has higher P/E ratio than RMBL: AN (7.25) vs RMBL (1.10). AN YTD gains are higher at: 17.104 vs. RMBL (-54.328). AN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.9B vs. RMBL (-55.9M). AN (60.8M) and RMBL (58.9M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RMBL has less debt than AN: RMBL (772M) vs AN (8.03B). AN has higher revenues than RMBL: AN (26.9B) vs RMBL (1.37B).
ANRMBLAN / RMBL
Capitalization6.9B227M3,041%
EBITDA1.9B-55.9M-3,394%
Gain YTD17.104-54.328-31%
P/E Ratio7.251.10662%
Revenue26.9B1.37B1,969%
Total Cash60.8M58.9M103%
Total Debt8.03B772M1,041%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AN vs RMBL: Fundamental Ratings
AN
RMBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9100
SMR RATING
1..100
3599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2927

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMBL's Valuation (39) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as AN (71) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RMBL’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AN’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

AN's SMR Rating (35) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBL (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AN’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RMBL (59) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

AN's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AN’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANRMBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGFFX81.850.04
+0.05%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F
MSEQX68.34N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth I
KLCSX20.59N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
NSNRX47.73-0.42
-0.87%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R3
ICWIX6.16-0.13
-2.07%
Integrity Mid-North American Resources I

AN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AN has been closely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AN jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AN
1D Price
Change %
AN100%
+1.08%
ABG - AN
83%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
PAG - AN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
GPI - AN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
SAH - AN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
LAD - AN
75%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
More

RMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBL has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMBL jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBL
1D Price
Change %
RMBL100%
-0.40%
AN - RMBL
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
HVT - RMBL
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
HZO - RMBL
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CWH - RMBL
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
ONEW - RMBL
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
More