AMYZF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
81.59M
TWOSF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.04 (+66.67%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMYZF vs TWOSF

Header iconAMYZF vs TWOSF Comparison
Open Charts AMYZF vs TWOSFBanner chart's image
RECYCLICO BATTERY MATERIALS
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$40.2K
Capitalization81.59M
T2 METALS
Price$0.10
Change+$0.04 (+66.67%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization6.2M
AMYZF vs TWOSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMYZF vs. TWOSF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMYZF is a Hold and TWOSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AMYZF: $0.03 vs. TWOSF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: AMYZF and TWOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMYZF: 39% vs. TWOSF: 10%
Market capitalization -- AMYZF: $81.59M vs. TWOSF: $6.2M
AMYZF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $81.59M. TWOSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMYZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTWOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMYZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TWOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMYZF is a better buy in the long-term than TWOSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMYZF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWOSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMYZF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TWOSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TWOSF is a better buy in the short-term than AMYZF.

Price Growth

AMYZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -9.06% price change this week, while TWOSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMYZF($81.6M) has a higher market cap than TWOSF($6.2M). TWOSF YTD gains are higher at: -30.404 vs. AMYZF (-51.901). TWOSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.22M vs. AMYZF (-4.7M). AMYZF has more cash in the bank: 21.1M vs. TWOSF (1.31M). AMYZF (0) and TWOSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AMYZFTWOSFAMYZF / TWOSF
Capitalization81.6M6.2M1,315%
EBITDA-4.7M-1.22M387%
Gain YTD-51.901-30.404171%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash21.1M1.31M1,616%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMYZF vs TWOSF: Fundamental Ratings
AMYZF
TWOSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9596
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9188
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1285
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TWOSF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMYZF (92). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMYZF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AMYZF (100). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to AMYZF’s over the last 12 months.

AMYZF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as TWOSF (96). This means that AMYZF’s stock grew similarly to TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's Price Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as AMYZF (91). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to AMYZF’s over the last 12 months.

AMYZF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TWOSF (85). This means that AMYZF’s stock grew significantly faster than TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMYZFTWOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LINC22.980.33
+1.46%
Lincoln Educational Services Corp
ASRMF33.85N/A
N/A
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste S.A. de C.V.
DDHRF2.06N/A
N/A
Dream Impact Trust
SOIEF24.75N/A
N/A
Stolt-Nielsen Ltd
HYFM3.63-0.10
-2.68%
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Inc.

AMYZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMYZF and SILEF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMYZF and SILEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMYZF
1D Price
Change %
AMYZF100%
-11.01%
SILEF - AMYZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LITOF - AMYZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.75%
TWOSF - AMYZF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALTPF - AMYZF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALMTF - AMYZF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
More

TWOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TWOSF and GUELF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TWOSF and GUELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWOSF
1D Price
Change %
TWOSF100%
N/A
GUELF - TWOSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABAT - TWOSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
FPRGF - TWOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGZFF - TWOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMYZF - TWOSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-11.01%
More