AMXEF
Price
$1.97
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
280.15M
BYAGF
Price
$0.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
189.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMXEF vs BYAGF

Header iconAMXEF vs BYAGF Comparison
Open Charts AMXEF vs BYAGFBanner chart's image
Amex Exploration
Price$1.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$55.28K
Capitalization280.15M
Banyan Gold
Price$0.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$463.23K
Capitalization189.14M
AMXEF vs BYAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMXEF vs. BYAGF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMXEF is a StrongBuy and BYAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (AMXEF: $1.97 vs. BYAGF: $0.50)
Brand notoriety: AMXEF and BYAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMXEF: 80% vs. BYAGF: 54%
Market capitalization -- AMXEF: $280.15M vs. BYAGF: $189.14M
AMXEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $280.15M. BYAGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $189.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMXEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBYAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMXEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BYAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BYAGF is a better buy in the long-term than AMXEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMXEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BYAGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMXEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BYAGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMXEF is a better buy in the short-term than BYAGF.

Price Growth

AMXEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.43% price change this week, while BYAGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6013.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMXEF($280M) has a higher market cap than BYAGF($189M). BYAGF YTD gains are higher at: 283.721 vs. AMXEF (154.851). BYAGF (-3.43M) and AMXEF (-3.58M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . BYAGF has more cash in the bank: 17.9M vs. AMXEF (5.94M). AMXEF (0) and BYAGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AMXEFBYAGFAMXEF / BYAGF
Capitalization280M189M148%
EBITDA-3.58M-3.43M104%
Gain YTD154.851283.72155%
P/E Ratio115.31N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.94M17.9M33%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMXEF vs BYAGF: Fundamental Ratings
AMXEF
BYAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
9394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYAGF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMXEF (89). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMXEF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMXEF (100). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMXEF’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as BYAGF (94). This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to BYAGF’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BYAGF (35). This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to BYAGF’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as BYAGF (100). This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to BYAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMXEFBYAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSHUX28.200.66
+2.40%
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Instl
ACGCX39.360.37
+0.95%
American Century Discplnd Cor Val C
MALVX32.130.29
+0.91%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Val Instl
NBNGX26.310.15
+0.57%
Sit Mid Cap Growth
IYGIX43.080.21
+0.49%
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund I

AMXEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMXEF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMXEF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMXEF
1D Price
Change %
AMXEF100%
+0.10%
BYAGF - AMXEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
CGLCF - AMXEF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
ALVLF - AMXEF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARBTF - AMXEF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+18.02%
ANKOF - AMXEF
-6%
Poorly correlated
+4.74%
More

BYAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BYAGF has been loosely correlated with PMDRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BYAGF jumps, then PMDRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYAGF
1D Price
Change %
BYAGF100%
-1.55%
PMDRF - BYAGF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALVLF - BYAGF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSUPF - BYAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+6.26%
CNL - BYAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.34%
APRAF - BYAGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More