AMVMF
Price
$25.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
ECRAF
Price
$0.86
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
378.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMVMF vs ECRAF

Header iconAMVMF vs ECRAF Comparison
Open Charts AMVMF vs ECRAFBanner chart's image
AMG Advanced Metallurgical Group
Price$25.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150
Capitalization1.31B
ECORA RESOURCES
Price$0.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.57K
Capitalization378.48M
AMVMF vs ECRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMVMF vs. ECRAF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMVMF is a Hold and ECRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AMVMF: $25.43 vs. ECRAF: $0.86)
Brand notoriety: AMVMF and ECRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMVMF: 23% vs. ECRAF: 85%
Market capitalization -- AMVMF: $1.31B vs. ECRAF: $378.48M
AMVMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.31B. ECRAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $378.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMVMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileECRAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMVMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ECRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMVMF is a better buy in the long-term than ECRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMVMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECRAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMVMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ECRAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMVMF is a better buy in the short-term than ECRAF.

Price Growth

AMVMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +25.16% price change this week, while ECRAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.40% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMVMF($1.31B) has a higher market cap than ECRAF($378M). AMVMF has higher P/E ratio than ECRAF: AMVMF (5.77) vs ECRAF (3.72). AMVMF YTD gains are higher at: 72.232 vs. ECRAF (2.454). AMVMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 439M vs. ECRAF (149M). AMVMF has more cash in the bank: 391M vs. ECRAF (5.72M). ECRAF has less debt than AMVMF: ECRAF (45.6M) vs AMVMF (721M). AMVMF has higher revenues than ECRAF: AMVMF (1.71B) vs ECRAF (142M).
AMVMFECRAFAMVMF / ECRAF
Capitalization1.31B378M346%
EBITDA439M149M295%
Gain YTD72.2322.4542,943%
P/E Ratio5.773.72155%
Revenue1.71B142M1,201%
Total Cash391M5.72M6,832%
Total Debt721M45.6M1,581%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMVMF vs ECRAF: Fundamental Ratings
AMVMF
ECRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
9143
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECRAF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as AMVMF (13). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew similarly to AMVMF’s over the last 12 months.

AMVMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRAF (100). This means that AMVMF’s stock grew similarly to ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMVMF (91). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMVMF’s over the last 12 months.

AMVMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRAF (51). This means that AMVMF’s stock grew similarly to ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

AMVMF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECRAF (100). This means that AMVMF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMVMFECRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETILX55.980.73
+1.32%
Eventide Gilead I
ARZDX6.240.03
+0.48%
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Z
PIIFX31.070.12
+0.39%
Victory Pioneer International Equ A
VWNEX73.880.27
+0.37%
Vanguard Windsor™ Admiral™
PPAEX20.800.07
+0.34%
GMO U.S. Opportunistic Value I

AMVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMVMF and JNDAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMVMF and JNDAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMVMF
1D Price
Change %
AMVMF100%
N/A
JNDAF - AMVMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPGDF - AMVMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
ABRMF - AMVMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSCF - AMVMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
QUEXF - AMVMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
More

ECRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECRAF and IPMLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECRAF and IPMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECRAF
1D Price
Change %
ECRAF100%
N/A
IPMLF - ECRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
NBMFF - ECRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMVMF - ECRAF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALMTF - ECRAF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
TWOSF - ECRAF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More