Intraday BUY SELL Signals
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMUB vs CQP
AMUB vs CQP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Notable companies
The most notable companies in this group are Enterprise Products Partners LP (NYSE:EPD), Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI), Energy Transfer LP (NYSE:ET), Cheniere Energy (NYSE:LNG), Targa Resources Corp (NYSE:TRGP), Plains All American Pipeline LP (NASDAQ:PAA), Antero Midstream Corp (NYSE:AM), Plains GP Holdings LP (NASDAQ:PAGP), CMB.TECH NV (NYSE:CMBT), Scorpio Tankers (NYSE:STNG).
Industry description
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the Oil & Gas Pipelines Industry is 12.22B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 7.66K to 103.62B. ENB holds the highest valuation in this group at 103.62B. The lowest valued company is AVACF at 7.66K.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Oil & Gas Pipelines Industry was -4%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 2%. TORO experienced the highest price growth at 25%, while BROGF experienced the biggest fall at -100%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Oil & Gas Pipelines Industry was -12%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -23% and the average quarterly volume growth was -68%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating: 32
P/E Growth Rating: 55
Price Growth Rating: 55
SMR Rating: 74
Profit Risk Rating: 58
Seasonality Score: 25 (-100 ... +100)
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 13.1B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 83.22M to 26.11B. CQP holds the highest valuation in this group at 26.11B. The lowest valued company is AMUB at 83.22M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -3%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2%. AMUB experienced the highest price growth at -2%, while CQP experienced the biggest fall at -3%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 45% and the average quarterly volume growth was 491%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating: 84
P/E Growth Rating: 30
Price Growth Rating: 55
SMR Rating: 10
Profit Risk Rating: 25
Seasonality Score: 50 (-100 ... +100)
AMUB vs. CQP commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMUB is a Hold and CQP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP: Fundamental Ratings
CQP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AMUB | CQP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
AMUB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMUB and CQP have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMUB and CQP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMUB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMUB | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| CQP - AMUB | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| GEL - AMUB | 6% Poorly correlated | +5.28% | ||
| USAC - AMUB | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| VNOM - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| NGL - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
CQP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been closely correlated with LNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then LNG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y