Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMUB vs AMZA
AMUB vs AMZA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMUB vs. AMZA commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMUB is a Buy and AMZA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMZA has more net assets: 401M vs. AMUB (83.2M). AMZA has a higher annual dividend yield than AMUB: AMZA (9.115) vs AMUB (8.603). AMUB was incepted earlier than AMZA: AMUB (10 years) vs AMZA (11 years).
| AMUB | AMZA | AMUB / AMZA | |
| Gain YTD | 8.603 | 9.115 | 94% |
| Net Assets | 83.2M | 401M | 21% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | 2.75 | - |
| Turnover | N/A | 237.00 | - |
| Yield | 5.92 | 8.38 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AMUB | AMZA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 7 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GAGCX | 36.98 | 0.24 | +0.65% |
| Gabelli Global Rising Income and Div AAA | |||
| MRSGX | 25.29 | 0.07 | +0.28% |
| MFS Research International R1 | |||
| GREZX | 9.65 | N/A | N/A |
| GuideStone Funds Global Rl Est Secs Inv | |||
| HFDFX | 19.72 | -0.17 | -0.85% |
| Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps F | |||
| LGMCX | 24.67 | -0.29 | -1.16% |
| Loomis Sayles Global Allocation C | |||
AMUB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMUB and CQP have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMUB and CQP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMUB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMUB | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| CQP - AMUB | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
| GEL - AMUB | 6% Poorly correlated | +4.82% | ||
| USAC - AMUB | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| VNOM - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
| NGL - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.54% | ||
More | ||||
AMZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMZA has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMZA jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZA | 100% | +2.62% | ||
| OKE - AMZA | 81% Closely correlated | +3.92% | ||
| ET - AMZA | 80% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| PAA - AMZA | 80% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| TRGP - AMZA | 77% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| MPLX - AMZA | 76% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||