It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMT (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а -2.20% price change this week, while SBAC (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was -3.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.57%.
AMT is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
SBAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
| AMT | SBAC | AMT / SBAC | |
| Capitalization | 82.5B | 20.1B | 410% |
| EBITDA | 6.35B | 1.69B | 376% |
| Gain YTD | -1.741 | -6.855 | 25% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.10 | 23.72 | 118% |
| Revenue | 10.3B | 2.73B | 378% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 277M | - |
| Total Debt | 45.2B | 14.8B | 305% |
AMT | SBAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SBAC's Valuation (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMT (98). This means that SBAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMT’s over the last 12 months.
SBAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMT (100). This means that SBAC’s stock grew similarly to AMT’s over the last 12 months.
AMT's SMR Rating (28) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBAC (97). This means that AMT’s stock grew significantly faster than SBAC’s over the last 12 months.
AMT's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SBAC (61). This means that AMT’s stock grew similarly to SBAC’s over the last 12 months.
SBAC's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMT (89). This means that SBAC’s stock grew similarly to AMT’s over the last 12 months.
| AMT | SBAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 56% | 7 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 7 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 60% | 7 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 7 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 9 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 64% | 11 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 50% | 7 days ago 61% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FXP | 17.69 | 0.12 | +0.68% |
| ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | |||
| JMEE | 64.51 | -0.09 | -0.14% |
| JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enh Eq ETF | |||
| SMOT | 36.15 | -0.12 | -0.33% |
| VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | |||
| VEGI | 39.03 | -0.15 | -0.38% |
| iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF | |||
| IBGB | 24.96 | -0.35 | -1.39% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Trsy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMT has been closely correlated with SBAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMT jumps, then SBAC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBAC has been closely correlated with AMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBAC jumps, then AMT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBAC | 100% | -0.82% | ||
| AMT - SBAC | 84% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| CCI - SBAC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| ADC - SBAC | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| FCPT - SBAC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| O - SBAC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||