Advertisement
AMT vs REGCP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMT is a Buy and REGCP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileREGCP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- REGCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REGCP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- REGCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMT (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а -2.71% price change this week, while REGCP (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMT is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.18% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.88% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| AMT | REGCP | AMT / REGCP | |
| Capitalization | 92.9B | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | 6.35B | 1B | 632% |
| Gain YTD | 9.877 | 9.712 | 102% |
| P/E Ratio | 37.07 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 10.3B | 1.5B | 689% |
| Total Cash | 2.08B | 151M | 1,375% |
| Total Debt | 45.2B | 5.41B | 835% |
AMT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMT | REGCP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 14% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 30% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 26% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 12% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 26% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 25% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 20% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 9% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VXUS | 71.78 | 0.47 | +0.65% |
| Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | |||
| GOCT | 37.72 | -0.03 | -0.09% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Oct | |||
| XUDV | 26.54 | -0.08 | -0.30% |
| Franklin U.S. Dividend Mltplr Idx ETF | |||
| XUSP | 44.35 | -0.20 | -0.45% |
| Innovator Uncapped Accelerated US Eq ETF | |||
| USO | 72.63 | -1.55 | -2.09% |
| United States Oil | |||
AMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMT has been closely correlated with SBAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMT jumps, then SBAC could also see price increases.
REGCP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that REGCP and LANDM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that REGCP and LANDM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To REGCP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REGCP | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| LANDM - REGCP | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.00% | ||
| MPW - REGCP | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.60% | ||
| REGCO - REGCP | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| NSA - REGCP | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| AMT - REGCP | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||