AMSYF
Price
$34.05
Change
+$0.86 (+2.59%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
29.26B
MT
Price
$38.48
Change
-$0.30 (-0.77%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
29.26B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMSYF vs MT

Header iconAMSYF vs MT Comparison
Open Charts AMSYF vs MTBanner chart's image
ArcelorMittal
Price$34.05
Change+$0.86 (+2.59%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization29.26B
ArcelorMittal
Price$38.48
Change-$0.30 (-0.77%)
Volume$970.78K
Capitalization29.26B
AMSYF vs MT Comparison Chart in %
AMSYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMSYF vs. MT commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMSYF is a Hold and MT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AMSYF: $34.05 vs. MT: $38.48)
Brand notoriety: AMSYF: Not notable vs. MT: Notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMSYF: 19% vs. MT: 69%
Market capitalization -- AMSYF: $29.26B vs. MT: $29.26B
AMSYF [@Steel] is valued at $29.26B. MT’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $29.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $30.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMSYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMSYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMSYF and MT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMSYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMSYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMSYF is a better buy in the short-term than MT.

Price Growth

AMSYF (@Steel) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MT (@Steel) price change was +3.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

MT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.52% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMSYF($29.3B) and MT($29.3B) have the same market capitalization . MT has higher P/E ratio than AMSYF: MT (11.73) vs AMSYF (10.38). MT YTD gains are higher at: 67.852 vs. AMSYF (35.501). AMSYF (4.49B) and MT (4.49B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . AMSYF (5.36B) and MT (5.36B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . AMSYF (13.7B) and MT (13.7B) have identical debt. AMSYF (60.6B) and MT (60.6B) have equivalent revenues.
AMSYFMTAMSYF / MT
Capitalization29.3B29.3B100%
EBITDA4.49B4.49B100%
Gain YTD35.50167.85252%
P/E Ratio10.3811.7388%
Revenue60.6B60.6B100%
Total Cash5.36B5.36B100%
Total Debt13.7B13.7B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMSYF vs MT: Fundamental Ratings
AMSYF
MT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5077
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3328
SMR RATING
1..100
3939
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8584
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMSYF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as MT (15) in the Steel industry. This means that AMSYF’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Steel industry is in the same range as AMSYF (33) in the null industry. This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to AMSYF’s over the last 12 months.

MT's SMR Rating (39) in the Steel industry is in the same range as AMSYF (39) in the null industry. This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to AMSYF’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Steel industry is in the same range as AMSYF (46) in the null industry. This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to AMSYF’s over the last 12 months.

MT's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Steel industry is in the same range as AMSYF (85) in the null industry. This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to AMSYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMSYFMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMSYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRGE82.910.65
+0.80%
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETF
PJFM60.17N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
QNXT27.80N/A
N/A
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
ECOW24.05-0.05
-0.20%
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
IFRA52.89-0.12
-0.23%
iShares US Infrastructure ETF

AMSYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMSYF has been loosely correlated with BLSFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMSYF jumps, then BLSFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMSYF
1D Price
Change %
AMSYF100%
N/A
BLSFF - AMSYF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NUE - AMSYF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
MT - AMSYF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
SID - AMSYF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
APEMY - AMSYF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MT has been loosely correlated with CLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MT jumps, then CLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MT
1D Price
Change %
MT100%
-0.77%
CLF - MT
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
TX - MT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
CMC - MT
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.67%
GGB - MT
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
SID - MT
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
More