AMSF
Price
$41.37
Change
+$0.18 (+0.44%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
783.28M
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FAF
Price
$64.01
Change
+$0.17 (+0.27%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.52B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMSF vs FAF

Header iconAMSF vs FAF Comparison
Open Charts AMSF vs FAFBanner chart's image
AMERISAFE
Price$41.37
Change+$0.18 (+0.44%)
Volume$2.39K
Capitalization783.28M
First American Financial
Price$64.01
Change+$0.17 (+0.27%)
Volume$419.15K
Capitalization6.52B
AMSF vs FAF Comparison Chart in %
AMSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMSF vs. FAF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMSF is a Buy and FAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AMSF: $41.39 vs. FAF: $64.01)
Brand notoriety: AMSF and FAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMSF: 79% vs. FAF: 56%
Market capitalization -- AMSF: $783.28M vs. FAF: $6.52B
AMSF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $783.28M. FAF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $6.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $15.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMSF and FAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMSF is a better buy in the short-term than FAF.

Price Growth

AMSF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while FAF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +5.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMSF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

FAF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+3.08% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAF($6.52B) has a higher market cap than AMSF($783M). AMSF has higher P/E ratio than FAF: AMSF (15.92) vs FAF (13.77). FAF YTD gains are higher at: 4.981 vs. AMSF (-18.061). AMSF has less debt than FAF: AMSF (536K) vs FAF (1.11B). FAF has higher revenues than AMSF: FAF (6.51B) vs AMSF (306M).
AMSFFAFAMSF / FAF
Capitalization783M6.52B12%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.0614.981-363%
P/E Ratio15.9213.77116%
Revenue306M6.51B5%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt536K1.11B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMSF vs FAF: Fundamental Ratings
AMSF
FAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1219
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7762
SMR RATING
1..100
4894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAF's Valuation (30) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMSF (63) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that FAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMSF’s over the last 12 months.

FAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AMSF (77) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that FAF’s stock grew similarly to AMSF’s over the last 12 months.

AMSF's SMR Rating (48) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAF (94) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that AMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAF’s over the last 12 months.

FAF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AMSF (63) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that FAF’s stock grew similarly to AMSF’s over the last 12 months.

AMSF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAF (99) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that AMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMSFFAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMSIX12.660.03
+0.24%
Praxis Small Cap Index I
MITIX37.80N/A
N/A
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr I
GQJIX11.88N/A
N/A
GQG Partners Intl Qual Val Fd Ins
SPFAX31.61-0.09
-0.28%
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth A
CLTIX17.43-0.07
-0.40%
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation I

AMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMSF has been loosely correlated with EIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMSF jumps, then EIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMSF
1D Price
Change %
AMSF100%
+0.32%
EIG - AMSF
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
AXS - AMSF
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
FAF - AMSF
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
ESNT - AMSF
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
ACT - AMSF
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More

FAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAF has been closely correlated with FNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAF jumps, then FNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAF
1D Price
Change %
FAF100%
-0.41%
FNF - FAF
82%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
MTG - FAF
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
ESNT - FAF
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
RDN - FAF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
ACT - FAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More