AMSC
Price
$27.18
Change
-$2.82 (-9.40%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.43B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLS
Price
$78.42
Change
-$1.34 (-1.68%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.14B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMSC vs FLS

Header iconAMSC vs FLS Comparison
Open Charts AMSC vs FLSBanner chart's image
American Superconductor
Price$27.18
Change-$2.82 (-9.40%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.43B
Flowserve
Price$78.42
Change-$1.34 (-1.68%)
Volume$704
Capitalization10.14B
AMSC vs FLS Comparison Chart in %
AMSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMSC vs. FLS commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMSC is a Hold and FLS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (AMSC: $30.00 vs. FLS: $79.76)
Brand notoriety: AMSC and FLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMSC: 125% vs. FLS: 119%
Market capitalization -- AMSC: $1.43B vs. FLS: $10.14B
AMSC [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $1.43B. FLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $10.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $239.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $17.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMSC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the long-term than AMSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the short-term than AMSC.

Price Growth

AMSC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -6.75% price change this week, while FLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMSC is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

FLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+0.37% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLS($10.1B) has a higher market cap than AMSC($1.43B). AMSC has higher P/E ratio than FLS: AMSC (81.08) vs FLS (23.19). FLS YTD gains are higher at: 14.961 vs. AMSC (4.239). FLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 798M vs. AMSC (18.3M). AMSC has less debt than FLS: AMSC (3.65M) vs FLS (1.67B). FLS has higher revenues than AMSC: FLS (4.69B) vs AMSC (266M).
AMSCFLSAMSC / FLS
Capitalization1.43B10.1B14%
EBITDA18.3M798M2%
Gain YTD4.23914.96128%
P/E Ratio81.0823.19350%
Revenue266M4.69B6%
Total Cash213MN/A-
Total Debt3.65M1.67B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMSC vs FLS: Fundamental Ratings
AMSC
FLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
986
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9227
SMR RATING
1..100
8343
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9976
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLS's Valuation (66) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMSC (99) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMSC’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMSC (92) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMSC’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's SMR Rating (43) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMSC (83) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMSC’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AMSC (65) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to AMSC’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AMSC (99) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to AMSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMSCFLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDTE30.260.17
+0.56%
Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTECovCllStgyETF
IBTJ21.88N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Tr ETF
BSEP49.65-0.27
-0.53%
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF-Sep
ETHW16.43-0.19
-1.14%
Bitwise Ethereum ETF
VPC17.22-0.21
-1.20%
Virtus Private Credit ETF

AMSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMSC has been loosely correlated with ZWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMSC jumps, then ZWS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMSC
1D Price
Change %
AMSC100%
-0.07%
ZWS - AMSC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
ITT - AMSC
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
NPO - AMSC
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
GHM - AMSC
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.97%
FLS - AMSC
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
+0.71%
ITT - FLS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
CMI - FLS
70%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
FELE - FLS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
CR - FLS
67%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
GGG - FLS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More