Advertisement
AMS vs HCSG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMS is a Buy and HCSG is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCSG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HCSG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HCSG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- HCSG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.42% price change this week, while HCSG (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +1.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
HCSG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.27% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| AMS | HCSG | AMS / HCSG | |
| Capitalization | 18.5M | 918M | 2% |
| EBITDA | 7.01M | 75.3M | 9% |
| Gain YTD | -25.705 | 26.130 | -98% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.86 | 24.02 | 174% |
| Revenue | 20.7M | 1.67B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 14.5M | 147M | 10% |
| Total Debt | 13.4M | 36.2M | 37% |
AMS | HCSG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCSG's Valuation (21) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is in the same range as AMS (47) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCSG’s stock grew similarly to AMS’s over the last 12 months.
AMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCSG (100) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that AMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCSG’s over the last 12 months.
HCSG's SMR Rating (75) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is in the same range as AMS (81) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCSG’s stock grew similarly to AMS’s over the last 12 months.
HCSG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMS (88) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMS’s over the last 12 months.
HCSG's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMS (98) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCSG’s stock grew significantly faster than AMS’s over the last 12 months.
| HCSG | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
AMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMS and FMS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMS and FMS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMS | 100% | -2.07% | ||
| FMS - AMS | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
| EHC - AMS | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| HCSG - AMS | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| DVA - AMS | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| ADUS - AMS | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||
HCSG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCSG has been loosely correlated with NHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCSG jumps, then NHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCSG | 100% | -1.15% | ||
| NHC - HCSG | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| USPH - HCSG | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| BKD - HCSG | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
| JYNT - HCSG | 32% Poorly correlated | -7.71% | ||
| INNV - HCSG | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.07% | ||
More | ||||