AMS
Price
$3.01
Change
+$0.13 (+4.51%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
18.46M
32 days until earnings call
FMS
Price
$23.09
Change
+$0.15 (+0.65%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
11.2B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMS vs FMS

Header iconAMS vs FMS Comparison
Open Charts AMS vs FMSBanner chart's image
American Shared Hospital Services
Price$3.01
Change+$0.13 (+4.51%)
Volume$8.28K
Capitalization18.46M
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$23.09
Change+$0.15 (+0.65%)
Volume$540.9K
Capitalization11.2B
AMS vs FMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMS vs. FMS commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMS is a Buy and FMS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (AMS: $2.93 vs. FMS: $23.60)
Brand notoriety: AMS and FMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMS: 66% vs. FMS: 86%
Market capitalization -- AMS: $18.46M vs. FMS: $11.2B
AMS [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $18.46M. FMS’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $11.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the long-term than AMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMS’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMS’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the short-term than AMS.

Price Growth

AMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -4.87% price change this week, while FMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +14.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

FMS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+14.19% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($11.2B) has a higher market cap than AMS($18.5M). AMS has higher P/E ratio than FMS: AMS (41.86) vs FMS (20.80). FMS YTD gains are higher at: 4.240 vs. AMS (-8.150). FMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.21B vs. AMS (7.01M). FMS has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. AMS (14.5M). AMS has less debt than FMS: AMS (13.4M) vs FMS (12.1B). FMS has higher revenues than AMS: FMS (19.5B) vs AMS (20.7M).
AMSFMSAMS / FMS
Capitalization18.5M11.2B0%
EBITDA7.01M3.21B0%
Gain YTD-8.1504.240-192%
P/E Ratio41.8620.80201%
Revenue20.7M19.5B0%
Total Cash14.5M1.54B1%
Total Debt13.4M12.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMS vs FMS: Fundamental Ratings
AMS
FMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
221
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
5384
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10069
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMS's Valuation (14) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as AMS (46). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to AMS’s over the last 12 months.

AMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMS (100). This means that AMS’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.

AMS's SMR Rating (53) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMS (84). This means that AMS’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as AMS (62). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to AMS’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as AMS (100). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to AMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMSFMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
77%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

AMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMS and FMS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMS and FMS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMS
1D Price
Change %
AMS100%
-2.01%
FMS - AMS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
EHC - AMS
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
DVA - AMS
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
AMED - AMS
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
ADUS - AMS
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More

FMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with DVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then DVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMS
1D Price
Change %
FMS100%
+0.68%
DVA - FMS
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
UHS - FMS
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
USPH - FMS
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
HCA - FMS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
HCSG - FMS
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
More