AMS
Price
$2.29
Change
+$0.02 (+0.88%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
14.91M
24 days until earnings call
EWP
Price
$49.47
Change
+$0.04 (+0.08%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Net Assets
1.43B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMS vs EWP

Header iconAMS vs EWP Comparison
Open Charts AMS vs EWPBanner chart's image
American Shared Hospital Services
Price$2.29
Change+$0.02 (+0.88%)
Volume$20.34K
Capitalization14.91M
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
Price$49.47
Change+$0.04 (+0.08%)
Volume$320.26K
Net Assets1.43B
AMS vs EWP Comparison Chart in %
AMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMS vs. EWP commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMS is a Hold and EWP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AMS: $2.29)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • AMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AMS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.

Price Growth

AMS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -0.43% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+0.23% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMS: Fundamental Ratings
AMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMSEWP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZVNIX44.340.21
+0.48%
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
BPAVX33.630.15
+0.45%
Boston Partners All Cap Value Inv
CICCX66.350.10
+0.15%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer 529C
LIRVX9.85-0.02
-0.20%
Lord Abbett International Value R6
TIVRX33.71-0.29
-0.85%
Thornburg International Equity R5

AMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMS and SEM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMS and SEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMS
1D Price
Change %
AMS100%
+0.88%
SEM - AMS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
BKD - AMS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
PNTG - AMS
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
FMS - AMS
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
BDUUY - AMS
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWP
1D Price
Change %
EWP100%
+0.08%
SAN - EWP
79%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
BBVA - EWP
77%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
FER - EWP
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
TEF - EWP
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
AMS - EWP
-7%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%