Advertisement
AMS vs EWP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMS is a Buy and EWP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- AMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
AMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.42% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-1.38% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
AMS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EWP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INIIX | 24.39 | 0.44 | +1.84% |
| VanEck International Investors Gold I | |||
| NSMCX | 24.34 | -0.39 | -1.58% |
| Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value C | |||
| VWILX | 114.26 | -2.05 | -1.76% |
| Vanguard International Growth Adm | |||
| LMISX | 24.18 | -0.48 | -1.95% |
| Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity IS | |||
| TCSEX | 16.49 | -0.33 | -1.96% |
| Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity A | |||
AMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMS and FMS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMS and FMS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMS | 100% | -2.07% | ||
| FMS - AMS | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
| EHC - AMS | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| HCSG - AMS | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| DVA - AMS | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| ADUS - AMS | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||
EWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.