AMS
Price
$2.52
Change
+$0.04 (+1.61%)
Updated
Jul 7, 12:01 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.46M
37 days until earnings call
EHC
Price
$119.04
Change
+$0.16 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.27B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMS vs EHC

Header iconAMS vs EHC Comparison
Open Charts AMS vs EHCBanner chart's image
American Shared Hospital Services
Price$2.52
Change+$0.04 (+1.61%)
Volume$100
Capitalization18.46M
Encompass Health
Price$119.04
Change+$0.16 (+0.13%)
Volume$400.75K
Capitalization8.27B
AMS vs EHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMS vs. EHC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMS is a Hold and EHC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AMS: $2.49 vs. EHC: $119.04)
Brand notoriety: AMS and EHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMS: 17% vs. EHC: 58%
Market capitalization -- AMS: $18.46M vs. EHC: $8.27B
AMS [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $18.46M. EHC’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $8.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EHC is a better buy in the long-term than AMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EHC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • EHC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMS is a better buy in the short-term than EHC.

Price Growth

AMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +3.75% price change this week, while EHC (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

EHC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+1.51% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EHC($8.27B) has a higher market cap than AMS($18.5M). AMS has higher P/E ratio than EHC: AMS (41.86) vs EHC (23.18). EHC YTD gains are higher at: 29.535 vs. AMS (-21.944). EHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.03B vs. AMS (7.01M). EHC has more cash in the bank: 69.1M vs. AMS (14.5M). AMS has less debt than EHC: AMS (13.4M) vs EHC (2.93B). EHC has higher revenues than AMS: EHC (4.8B) vs AMS (20.7M).
AMSEHCAMS / EHC
Capitalization18.5M8.27B0%
EBITDA7.01M1.03B1%
Gain YTD-21.94429.535-74%
P/E Ratio41.8623.18181%
Revenue20.7M4.8B0%
Total Cash14.5M69.1M21%
Total Debt13.4M2.93B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMS vs EHC: Fundamental Ratings
AMS
EHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5077
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7912
SMR RATING
1..100
8139
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9846
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMS's Valuation (46) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as EHC (73) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMS’s stock grew similarly to EHC’s over the last 12 months.

EHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMS (79) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that EHC’s stock grew significantly faster than AMS’s over the last 12 months.

EHC's SMR Rating (39) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMS (81) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that EHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMS’s over the last 12 months.

EHC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as AMS (63) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that EHC’s stock grew similarly to AMS’s over the last 12 months.

EHC's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMS (98) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that EHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMSEHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAX26.310.69
+2.70%
Cambria Tax Aware ETF
IBAT22.880.47
+2.08%
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
VFMO173.741.95
+1.14%
Vanguard US Momentum Factor ETF
UFEB34.470.11
+0.32%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Bffr ETF™ Feb
MAGG20.32-0.03
-0.12%
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF

AMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMS and FMS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMS and FMS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMS
1D Price
Change %
AMS100%
+2.36%
FMS - AMS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
EHC - AMS
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
HCSG - AMS
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
DVA - AMS
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADUS - AMS
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More

EHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EHC has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EHC jumps, then THC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EHC
1D Price
Change %
EHC100%
-1.15%
THC - EHC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
UHS - EHC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
ENSG - EHC
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
SGRY - EHC
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
SEM - EHC
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More