It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMRX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMRX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMRX (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +14.37% price change this week, while EBS (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +7.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +68.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +80.82%.
AMRX is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.
EBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
AMRX | EBS | AMRX / EBS | |
Capitalization | 2.95B | 471M | 626% |
EBITDA | 549M | 105M | 523% |
Gain YTD | 18.561 | -7.741 | -240% |
P/E Ratio | 939.00 | 3.37 | 27,893% |
Revenue | 2.83B | 930M | 304% |
Total Cash | 59.2M | 149M | 40% |
Total Debt | 2.58B | 666M | 387% |
AMRX | EBS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EBS's Valuation (54) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMRX (99) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
AMRX's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AMRX’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBS’s over the last 12 months.
EBS's SMR Rating (96) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as AMRX (99) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew similarly to AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
EBS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as AMRX (43) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew similarly to AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
AMRX's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as EBS (48) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AMRX’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.
AMRX | EBS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 8 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago76% | 15 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago75% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
USPVX | 32.92 | 0.03 | +0.09% |
Union Street Partners Value A | |||
CLXRX | 60.34 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
Columbia Large Cap Index Inst2 | |||
VDSYX | 24.85 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
Victory Diversified Stock Y | |||
RGBEX | 40.46 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
American Funds Global Balanced R4 | |||
GGOSX | 10.65 | -0.10 | -0.93% |
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth Svc |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMRX has been loosely correlated with PAHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMRX jumps, then PAHC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMRX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMRX | 100% | -0.11% | ||
PAHC - AMRX | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
VTRS - AMRX | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
HROW - AMRX | 45% Loosely correlated | +9.62% | ||
AMPH - AMRX | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
TEVA - AMRX | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBS has been loosely correlated with SIGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBS jumps, then SIGA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EBS | 100% | +0.34% | ||
SIGA - EBS | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
HROW - EBS | 41% Loosely correlated | +9.62% | ||
AMRX - EBS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
VTRS - EBS | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
ELAN - EBS | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More |