It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMRC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMRC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMRC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -10.04% price change this week, while FLR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -3.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.95%.
AMRC is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
FLR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
AMRC | FLR | AMRC / FLR | |
Capitalization | 1.25B | 9.17B | 14% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -24.471 | 36.456 | -67% |
P/E Ratio | 23.92 | 36.86 | 65% |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 1.4B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 1.15B | - |
AMRC | FLR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMRC's Valuation (74) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (83). This means that AMRC’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMRC (85). This means that FLR’s stock grew significantly faster than AMRC’s over the last 12 months.
AMRC's SMR Rating (80) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (84). This means that AMRC’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMRC (84). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMRC’s over the last 12 months.
AMRC's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (91). This means that AMRC’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
AMRC | FLR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMRC has been loosely correlated with BLNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMRC jumps, then BLNK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMRC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMRC | 100% | -1.60% | ||
BLNK - AMRC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
BLD - AMRC | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
FLR - AMRC | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
MTZ - AMRC | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.32% | ||
GVA - AMRC | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with STN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then STN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLR | 100% | -2.16% | ||
STN - FLR | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
ROAD - FLR | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
AMRC - FLR | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
NVEE - FLR | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
BLD - FLR | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More |