It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHNRG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNRG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMR (@Coal) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while HNRG (@Coal) price change was -6.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.06%.
AMR is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
HNRG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
AMR | HNRG | AMR / HNRG | |
Capitalization | 4.23B | 167M | 2,533% |
EBITDA | 998M | 127M | 786% |
Gain YTD | -43.724 | 41.310 | -106% |
P/E Ratio | 6.60 | 3.84 | 172% |
Revenue | 3.47B | 634M | 547% |
Total Cash | 268M | 2.84M | 9,430% |
Total Debt | 10.4M | 119M | 9% |
AMR | HNRG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HNRG's Valuation (81) in the Coal industry is in the same range as AMR (82) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that HNRG’s stock grew similarly to AMR’s over the last 12 months.
HNRG's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Coal industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMR (71) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that HNRG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMR’s over the last 12 months.
AMR's SMR Rating (88) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as HNRG (98) in the Coal industry. This means that AMR’s stock grew similarly to HNRG’s over the last 12 months.
HNRG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Coal industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMR (89) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that HNRG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMR’s over the last 12 months.
AMR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as HNRG (11) in the Coal industry. This means that AMR’s stock grew similarly to HNRG’s over the last 12 months.
AMR | HNRG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago84% | about 1 month ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 6 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 3 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago88% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PGIUX | 15.58 | -0.11 | -0.70% |
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infras I | |||
HICGX | 32.83 | -0.40 | -1.20% |
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Inst | |||
JHLVX | 52.24 | -0.66 | -1.25% |
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core C | |||
FIIMX | 22.84 | -0.33 | -1.42% |
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II I | |||
DURAX | 13.98 | -0.21 | -1.48% |
DWS ESG International Core Eq A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMR has been closely correlated with HCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMR jumps, then HCC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMR | 100% | +2.10% | ||
HCC - AMR | 81% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
BTU - AMR | 67% Closely correlated | +2.79% | ||
METC - AMR | 66% Closely correlated | +7.12% | ||
ARCH - AMR | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
SXC - AMR | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNRG has been loosely correlated with BTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNRG jumps, then BTU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HNRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HNRG | 100% | +0.12% | ||
BTU - HNRG | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
ARLP - HNRG | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
METC - HNRG | 35% Loosely correlated | +7.12% | ||
SXC - HNRG | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
AMR - HNRG | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
More |