Advertisement
AMR vs EEMV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMR is a Hold and EEMV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- AMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- AMR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMR (@Coal) experienced а +23.41% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was +7.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Coal (+7.45% weekly)Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
AMR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMR | EEMV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SJB | 15.62 | 0.03 | +0.19% |
| ProShares Short High Yield | |||
| CSHP | 99.65 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Enhanced ST Bond Active ETF | |||
| UTRE | 49.69 | -0.07 | -0.14% |
| F/m US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF | |||
| BSTZ | 21.64 | -0.22 | -1.01% |
| BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust | |||
| DFEN | 57.13 | -0.67 | -1.16% |
| Direxion Dly Aerospace&Def Bl 3X ShsETF | |||
AMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMR has been closely correlated with HCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMR jumps, then HCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMR | 100% | -4.06% | ||
| HCC - AMR | 86% Closely correlated | -3.54% | ||
| METC - AMR | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.23% | ||
| SXC - AMR | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| METCB - AMR | 41% Loosely correlated | +8.02% | ||
| AREC - AMR | 19% Poorly correlated | -3.89% | ||
More | ||||
EEMV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMV has been loosely correlated with LTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEMV jumps, then LTM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | 100% | -0.79% | ||
| LTM - EEMV | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| YUMC - EEMV | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| BAP - EEMV | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| PDD - EEMV | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| AMR - EEMV | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.06% | ||
More | ||||