AMR
Price
$112.62
Change
+$2.32 (+2.10%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.23B
47 days until earnings call
BTU
Price
$13.64
Change
+$0.37 (+2.79%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMR vs BTU

Header iconAMR vs BTU Comparison
Open Charts AMR vs BTUBanner chart's image
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
Price$112.62
Change+$2.32 (+2.10%)
Volume$229.75K
Capitalization4.23B
Peabody Energy
Price$13.64
Change+$0.37 (+2.79%)
Volume$3.6M
Capitalization3.1B
AMR vs BTU Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMR vs. BTU commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMR is a Hold and BTU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AMR: $112.62 vs. BTU: $13.64)
Brand notoriety: AMR and BTU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Coal industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMR: 78% vs. BTU: 70%
Market capitalization -- AMR: $4.23B vs. BTU: $3.1B
AMR [@Coal] is valued at $4.23B. BTU’s [@Coal] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Coal] industry ranges from $75.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Coal] industry is $6.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBTU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BTU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTU is a better buy in the long-term than AMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BTU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BTU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMR is a better buy in the short-term than BTU.

Price Growth

AMR (@Coal) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while BTU (@Coal) price change was +3.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMR is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

BTU is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Coal (+1.63% weekly)

Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMR($4.23B) has a higher market cap than BTU($3.1B). AMR has higher P/E ratio than BTU: AMR (6.60) vs BTU (4.83). BTU YTD gains are higher at: -34.216 vs. AMR (-43.724). BTU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.51B vs. AMR (998M). BTU has more cash in the bank: 969M vs. AMR (268M). AMR has less debt than BTU: AMR (10.4M) vs BTU (399M). BTU has higher revenues than AMR: BTU (4.95B) vs AMR (3.47B).
AMRBTUAMR / BTU
Capitalization4.23B3.1B136%
EBITDA998M1.51B66%
Gain YTD-43.724-34.216128%
P/E Ratio6.604.83137%
Revenue3.47B4.95B70%
Total Cash268M969M28%
Total Debt10.4M399M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMR vs BTU: Fundamental Ratings
AMR
BTU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7161
SMR RATING
1..100
8867
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8964
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
277
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTU's Valuation (39) in the Coal industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMR (82) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMR’s over the last 12 months.

BTU's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Coal industry is in the same range as AMR (71) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew similarly to AMR’s over the last 12 months.

BTU's SMR Rating (67) in the Coal industry is in the same range as AMR (88) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew similarly to AMR’s over the last 12 months.

BTU's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Coal industry is in the same range as AMR (89) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew similarly to AMR’s over the last 12 months.

AMR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTU (77) in the Coal industry. This means that AMR’s stock grew significantly faster than BTU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMRBTU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXN16.160.43
+2.73%
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX® ETF
CERY27.950.48
+1.75%
SPDR Blmbrg Enh Roll Y Cmd Stgy NoK-1ETF
CHY10.48-0.15
-1.41%
Calamos Convertible and High Income Fund
DFSV28.67-0.44
-1.51%
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
GSEU42.39-0.69
-1.60%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Europe Eq ETF

AMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMR has been closely correlated with HCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMR jumps, then HCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMR
1D Price
Change %
AMR100%
+2.10%
HCC - AMR
81%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
BTU - AMR
67%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
METC - AMR
66%
Closely correlated
+7.12%
ARCH - AMR
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SXC - AMR
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
More

BTU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTU has been closely correlated with AMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTU jumps, then AMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTU
1D Price
Change %
BTU100%
+2.79%
AMR - BTU
67%
Closely correlated
+2.10%
HCC - BTU
67%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
METC - BTU
64%
Loosely correlated
+7.12%
SXC - BTU
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
ARLP - BTU
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More