It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMPH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMPH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMPH (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -1.34% price change this week, while ZTS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.70%.
AMPH is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
ZTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
AMPH | ZTS | AMPH / ZTS | |
Capitalization | 2.11B | 77.5B | 3% |
EBITDA | 240M | 3.67B | 7% |
Gain YTD | -34.500 | -0.953 | 3,621% |
P/E Ratio | 16.69 | 32.94 | 51% |
Revenue | 644M | 8.54B | 8% |
Total Cash | 257M | 2.04B | 13% |
Total Debt | 624M | 6.76B | 9% |
AMPH | ZTS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMPH's Valuation (63) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as ZTS (72) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry. This means that AMPH’s stock grew similarly to ZTS’s over the last 12 months.
ZTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as AMPH (80) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ZTS’s stock grew similarly to AMPH’s over the last 12 months.
ZTS's SMR Rating (19) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as AMPH (41) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ZTS’s stock grew similarly to AMPH’s over the last 12 months.
ZTS's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as AMPH (87) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ZTS’s stock grew similarly to AMPH’s over the last 12 months.
ZTS's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as AMPH (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ZTS’s stock grew similarly to AMPH’s over the last 12 months.
AMPH | ZTS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 5 days ago54% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago72% | 9 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago53% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMPH has been loosely correlated with AMRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMPH jumps, then AMRX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMPH | 100% | +4.38% | ||
AMRX - AMPH | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
ALKS - AMPH | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.93% | ||
EOLS - AMPH | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
SUPN - AMPH | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.98% | ||
ORGO - AMPH | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZTS has been loosely correlated with ELAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZTS jumps, then ELAN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ZTS | 100% | +3.51% | ||
ELAN - ZTS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
AMRX - ZTS | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
VTRS - ZTS | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.39% | ||
AMPH - ZTS | 32% Poorly correlated | +4.38% | ||
HLN - ZTS | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.60% | ||
More |