Advertisement
AMPG vs SILC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMPG is a Hold and SILC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMPG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSILC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMPG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SILC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMPG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SILC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMPG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SILC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMPG (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +9.79% price change this week, while SILC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +4.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMPG is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2026.
SILC is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (+3.35% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| AMPG | SILC | AMPG / SILC | |
| Capitalization | 84.9M | 89M | 95% |
| EBITDA | -7M | -13.03M | 54% |
| Gain YTD | 23.746 | 6.667 | 356% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 22.6M | 59.5M | 38% |
| Total Cash | 8.39M | 55.1M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 4.3M | 6.41M | 67% |
AMPG | SILC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMPG's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SILC (71) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that AMPG’s stock grew similarly to SILC’s over the last 12 months.
AMPG's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SILC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that AMPG’s stock grew similarly to SILC’s over the last 12 months.
SILC's SMR Rating (95) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as AMPG (96) in the null industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to AMPG’s over the last 12 months.
AMPG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SILC (61) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that AMPG’s stock grew similarly to SILC’s over the last 12 months.
SILC's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as AMPG (100) in the null industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to AMPG’s over the last 12 months.
| AMPG | SILC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 29 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
AMPG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMPG has been loosely correlated with ONDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMPG jumps, then ONDS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMPG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMPG | 100% | -1.33% | ||
| ONDS - AMPG | 35% Loosely correlated | -5.46% | ||
| CRNT - AMPG | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| ASTS - AMPG | 33% Loosely correlated | +6.33% | ||
| INSG - AMPG | 33% Loosely correlated | +9.36% | ||
| LTRX - AMPG | 32% Poorly correlated | +5.74% | ||
More | ||||
SILC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SILC and ZBRA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SILC and ZBRA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILC | 100% | +5.23% | ||
| ZBRA - SILC | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
| BOXL - SILC | 26% Poorly correlated | -7.75% | ||
| AAOI - SILC | 24% Poorly correlated | +7.34% | ||
| CLFD - SILC | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| AMPG - SILC | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
More | ||||