AMP
Price
$489.28
Change
-$22.62 (-4.42%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
46.13B
50 days until earnings call
WT
Price
$13.43
Change
-$0.31 (-2.26%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.98B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMP vs WT

Header iconAMP vs WT Comparison
Open Charts AMP vs WTBanner chart's image
Ameriprise Financial
Price$489.28
Change-$22.62 (-4.42%)
Volume$678.09K
Capitalization46.13B
WisdomTree
Price$13.43
Change-$0.31 (-2.26%)
Volume$4.9M
Capitalization1.98B
AMP vs WT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMP vs. WT commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMP is a Buy and WT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AMP: $489.28 vs. WT: $13.43)
Brand notoriety: AMP: Not notable vs. WT: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMP: 161% vs. WT: 140%
Market capitalization -- AMP: $46.13B vs. WT: $1.98B
AMP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $46.13B. WT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the long-term than AMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the short-term than AMP.

Price Growth

AMP (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.96% price change this week, while WT (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

WT is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMP($46.1B) has a higher market cap than WT($1.98B). WT has higher P/E ratio than AMP: WT (32.76) vs AMP (15.25). WT YTD gains are higher at: 28.990 vs. AMP (-7.250). WT has less debt than AMP: WT (515M) vs AMP (6.01B).
AMPWTAMP / WT
Capitalization46.1B1.98B2,333%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.25028.990-25%
P/E Ratio15.2532.7647%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A106M-
Total Debt6.01B515M1,166%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMP vs WT: Fundamental Ratings
AMP
WT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1719
SMR RATING
1..100
4359
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4813
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WT's Valuation (33) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMP (88) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that WT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as WT (19) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to WT’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's SMR Rating (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as WT (59) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to WT’s over the last 12 months.

WT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AMP (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that WT’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.

WT's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMP (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that WT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMPWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENX9.550.13
+1.38%
Eaton Vance New York Municipal
SOXX247.052.88
+1.18%
iShares Semiconductor ETF
NURE30.050.24
+0.80%
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
SPEU49.040.22
+0.46%
SPDR® Portfolio Europe ETF
ZNOV26.250.01
+0.02%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrNov

AMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMP has been closely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMP jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMP
1D Price
Change %
AMP100%
-4.42%
EQH - AMP
82%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
RJF - AMP
79%
Closely correlated
-3.27%
KKR - AMP
78%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
CG - AMP
78%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
JHG - AMP
78%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
More

WT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WT has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WT jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WT
1D Price
Change %
WT100%
-2.26%
JHG - WT
70%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
KKR - WT
68%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
AMP - WT
66%
Closely correlated
-4.42%
EQH - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
CG - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More