AMP
Price
$500.97
Change
+$2.59 (+0.52%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
46.54B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RJF
Price
$165.80
Change
+$0.03 (+0.02%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
32.61B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMP vs RJF

Header iconAMP vs RJF Comparison
Open Charts AMP vs RJFBanner chart's image
Ameriprise Financial
Price$500.97
Change+$2.59 (+0.52%)
Volume$270.21K
Capitalization46.54B
Raymond James Financial
Price$165.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.02%)
Volume$411.1K
Capitalization32.61B
AMP vs RJF Comparison Chart in %
AMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMP vs. RJF commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMP is a Buy and RJF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (AMP: $500.97 vs. RJF: $165.80)
Brand notoriety: AMP and RJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMP: 42% vs. RJF: 31%
Market capitalization -- AMP: $46.54B vs. RJF: $32.61B
AMP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $46.54B. RJF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $32.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than AMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMP is a better buy in the short-term than RJF.

Price Growth

AMP (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.76% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMP is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

RJF is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMP($46.5B) has a higher market cap than RJF($32.6B). RJF has higher P/E ratio than AMP: RJF (16.10) vs AMP (13.78). RJF YTD gains are higher at: 8.137 vs. AMP (-4.703). AMP has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. RJF (2.61B). RJF has less debt than AMP: RJF (4.22B) vs AMP (5.89B). AMP has higher revenues than RJF: AMP (18B) vs RJF (13.8B).
AMPRJFAMP / RJF
Capitalization46.5B32.6B143%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.7038.137-58%
P/E Ratio13.7816.1086%
Revenue18B13.8B130%
Total Cash46.9B2.61B1,794%
Total Debt5.89B4.22B139%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMP vs RJF: Fundamental Ratings
AMP
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2577
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2019
SMR RATING
1..100
3910
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8750
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RJF's Valuation (78) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as AMP (84). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as AMP (20). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as AMP (39). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as AMP (52). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMP (87). This means that RJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMPRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVF5.310.03
+0.57%
Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust
HYEM20.030.03
+0.15%
VanEck EM High Yield Bond ETF
SIXD29.050.04
+0.15%
AllianzIM US Equity 6M Bfr10 Jun/Dec ETF
GSIG47.810.06
+0.13%
Goldman Sachs Acs Inv Gd Cp 1-5Yr Bd ETF
SHM47.960.02
+0.04%
Stt Strt® SPDR® Nuveen ICE S/T MuncplETF

AMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMP has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMP jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMP
1D Price
Change %
AMP100%
+0.52%
RJF - AMP
80%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
STT - AMP
78%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
KKR - AMP
77%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
CG - AMP
77%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
JHG - AMP
76%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
More

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
+0.02%
SF - RJF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
MS - RJF
82%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
EVR - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
AMP - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
GS - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
More