AMP
Price
$500.97
Change
+$2.59 (+0.52%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
46.54B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFG
Price
$89.59
Change
+$0.07 (+0.08%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
19.68B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMP vs PFG

Header iconAMP vs PFG Comparison
Open Charts AMP vs PFGBanner chart's image
Ameriprise Financial
Price$500.97
Change+$2.59 (+0.52%)
Volume$270.21K
Capitalization46.54B
Principal Financial Group
Price$89.59
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
Volume$455.17K
Capitalization19.68B
AMP vs PFG Comparison Chart in %
AMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMP vs. PFG commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMP is a Buy and PFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AMP: $500.97 vs. PFG: $89.59)
Brand notoriety: AMP and PFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMP: 42% vs. PFG: 35%
Market capitalization -- AMP: $46.54B vs. PFG: $19.68B
AMP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $46.54B. PFG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $19.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFG is a better buy in the long-term than AMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMP is a better buy in the short-term than PFG.

Price Growth

AMP (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.76% price change this week, while PFG (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMP is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

PFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMP($46.5B) has a higher market cap than PFG($19.7B). AMP (13.78) and PFG (13.14) have similar P/E ratio . PFG YTD gains are higher at: 19.101 vs. AMP (-4.703). AMP has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. PFG (32B). PFG has less debt than AMP: PFG (3.94B) vs AMP (5.89B). AMP has higher revenues than PFG: AMP (18B) vs PFG (15.8B).
AMPPFGAMP / PFG
Capitalization46.5B19.7B236%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.70319.101-25%
P/E Ratio13.7813.14105%
Revenue18B15.8B114%
Total Cash46.9B32B147%
Total Debt5.89B3.94B149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMP vs PFG: Fundamental Ratings
AMP
PFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4376
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
39100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5131
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8747
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFG's Valuation (20) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMP (84) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for PFG (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew significantly faster than PFG’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's SMR Rating (39) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFG (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFG’s over the last 12 months.

PFG's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AMP (51) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PFG’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.

PFG's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMP (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMPPFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PY53.070.27
+0.51%
Principal Value ETF
SCAP36.950.17
+0.45%
Infrastructure Capital Small Cap Inc ETF
XDIV28.060.11
+0.39%
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
BBIN72.840.15
+0.21%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Intl Eq ETF
CAOS89.85-0.01
-0.01%
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

AMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMP has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMP jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMP
1D Price
Change %
AMP100%
+0.52%
RJF - AMP
80%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
STT - AMP
78%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
KKR - AMP
77%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
CG - AMP
76%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
BN - AMP
76%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More

PFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFG has been closely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFG jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFG
1D Price
Change %
PFG100%
+0.08%
EQH - PFG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
CRBG - PFG
77%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
AMP - PFG
76%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
STT - PFG
76%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
BN - PFG
74%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More