AMP
Price
$545.50
Change
+$15.45 (+2.91%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
49.8B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CG
Price
$58.39
Change
+$0.12 (+0.21%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
21.04B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMP vs CG

Header iconAMP vs CG Comparison
Open Charts AMP vs CGBanner chart's image
Ameriprise Financial
Price$545.50
Change+$15.45 (+2.91%)
Volume$1.08M
Capitalization49.8B
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$58.39
Change+$0.12 (+0.21%)
Volume$4.16M
Capitalization21.04B
AMP vs CG Comparison Chart in %
AMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMP vs. CG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMP is a StrongBuy and CG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (AMP: $545.50 vs. CG: $58.39)
Brand notoriety: AMP and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMP: 176% vs. CG: 165%
Market capitalization -- AMP: $49.8B vs. CG: $21.04B
AMP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $49.8B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $21.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than AMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMP is a better buy in the short-term than CG.

Price Growth

AMP (@Investment Managers) experienced а +9.17% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMP is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

CG is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.60% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMP($49.8B) has a higher market cap than CG($21B). CG has higher P/E ratio than AMP: CG (32.80) vs AMP (14.36). AMP YTD gains are higher at: 11.249 vs. CG (-1.218). AMP has less debt than CG: AMP (5.89B) vs CG (12.7B). AMP has higher revenues than CG: AMP (18B) vs CG (2.99B).
AMPCGAMP / CG
Capitalization49.8B21B237%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.249-1.218-924%
P/E Ratio14.3632.8044%
Revenue18B2.99B602%
Total Cash46.9BN/A-
Total Debt5.89B12.7B46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMP vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
AMP
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2468
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1847
SMR RATING
1..100
3850
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8699
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CG's Valuation (25) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMP (90) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CG (47) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's SMR Rating (38) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CG (50) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CG (56) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CG (99) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMPCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDV42.890.31
+0.73%
iShares International Select Div ETF
MUST20.850.01
+0.05%
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Inc ETF
BAFE26.93-0.02
-0.06%
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF
LSEQ31.18-0.48
-1.52%
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
PGJ28.58-0.58
-1.99%
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF

AMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMP has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMP jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMP
1D Price
Change %
AMP100%
+2.91%
RJF - AMP
80%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
JHG - AMP
79%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
APO - AMP
77%
Closely correlated
+4.69%
CG - AMP
77%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
KKR - AMP
77%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
More

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
+0.21%
TPG - CG
87%
Closely correlated
+5.16%
OWL - CG
84%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
KKR - CG
84%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
APO - CG
82%
Closely correlated
+4.69%
ARES - CG
82%
Closely correlated
+4.27%
More