AMP
Price
$530.48
Change
-$10.53 (-1.95%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
43.57B
64 days until earnings call
BK
Price
$87.25
Change
+$0.09 (+0.10%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
42.88B
58 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMP vs BK

Header iconAMP vs BK Comparison
Open Charts AMP vs BKBanner chart's image
Ameriprise Financial
Price$530.48
Change-$10.53 (-1.95%)
Volume$690.24K
Capitalization43.57B
Bank of New York Mellon
Price$87.25
Change+$0.09 (+0.10%)
Volume$5.99M
Capitalization42.88B
AMP vs BK Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMP vs. BK commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMP is a Hold and BK is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (AMP: $547.06)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • AMP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BK is a better buy in the short-term than AMP.

Price Growth

AMP (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.45% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMP is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.82% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMP($43.6B) and BK($42.9B) have the same market capitalization . AMP has higher P/E ratio than BK: AMP (18.34) vs BK (14.72). BK YTD gains are higher at: 16.347 vs. AMP (3.031). AMP has more cash in the bank: 59.1B vs. BK (5.72B). AMP has less debt than BK: AMP (5.76B) vs BK (31.7B). BK has higher revenues than AMP: BK (17.3B) vs AMP (15.5B).
AMPBKAMP / BK
Capitalization43.6B42.9B102%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.03116.34719%
P/E Ratio18.3414.72125%
Revenue15.5B17.3B90%
Total Cash59.1B5.72B1,033%
Total Debt5.76B31.7B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMP vs BK: Fundamental Ratings
AMP
BK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7784
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
413
SMR RATING
1..100
937
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
469
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2741
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMP's Valuation (84) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BK (85) in the Major Banks industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to BK’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BK (13) in the Major Banks industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to BK’s over the last 12 months.

BK's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMP (93) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BK’s stock grew significantly faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.

BK's Price Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMP (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BK’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BK (41) in the Major Banks industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to BK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMPBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

AMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMP has been closely correlated with PFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMP jumps, then PFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMP
1D Price
Change %
AMP100%
+0.21%
PFG - AMP
75%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
BLK - AMP
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
BK - AMP
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
JHG - AMP
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
APO - AMP
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
More

BK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BK has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BK jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BK
1D Price
Change %
BK100%
+1.21%
NTRS - BK
70%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
STT - BK
69%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
AMP - BK
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
PFG - BK
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
BN - BK
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
More