Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMOM vs IWF
AMOM vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts AMOM vs IWF
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Mmntm ETF
Price$48.62
Change+$0.38 (+0.79%)
Volume$118
Net Assets22.97M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$477.63
Change+$1.15 (+0.24%)
Volume$9.84K
Net Assets125.37B
AMOM vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMOM vs. IWF commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMOM is a Hold and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 125B vs. AMOM (23M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than AMOM: IWF (19.004) vs AMOM (6.877). AMOM was incepted earlier than IWF: AMOM (7 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than AMOM (0.75). AMOM has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| AMOM | IWF | AMOM / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 6.877 | 19.004 | 36% |
| Net Assets | 23M | 125B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.18 | 417% |
| Turnover | 354.00 | 13.00 | 2,723% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.35 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AMOM | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 77% | 17 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
AMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMOM has been closely correlated with GEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMOM jumps, then GEV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMOM | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| GEV - AMOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| HWM - AMOM | 73% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| CRWD - AMOM | 71% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| PLTR - AMOM | 68% Closely correlated | +3.16% | ||
| TT - AMOM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +5.71% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +3.80% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||