Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMOM vs IWF
AMOM vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts AMOM vs IWF
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Mmntm ETF
Price$48.90
Change-$0.29 (-0.59%)
Volume$2.46K
Net Assets31.78M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$467.12
Change+$2.35 (+0.51%)
Volume$3.09M
Net Assets120.73B
AMOM vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMOM vs. IWF commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMOM is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 121B vs. AMOM (31.8M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than AMOM: IWF (16.667) vs AMOM (8.330). AMOM was incepted earlier than IWF: AMOM (6 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than AMOM (0.75). AMOM has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| AMOM | IWF | AMOM / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 8.330 | 16.667 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 31.8M | 121B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.18 | 417% |
| Turnover | 354.00 | 13.00 | 2,723% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.35 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AMOM | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 10 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMOM and ADSK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMOM and ADSK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMOM | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| ADSK - AMOM | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
| HUBB - AMOM | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
| MDB - AMOM | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.33% | ||
| CCO - AMOM | 25% Poorly correlated | +19.72% | ||
| HUBS - AMOM | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||