Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMOM vs IWF
AMOM vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts AMOM vs IWF
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Mmntm ETF
Price$46.01
Change+$0.31 (+0.68%)
Volume$100
Net Assets29.73M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$451.87
Change+$2.58 (+0.57%)
Volume$8.25K
Net Assets117.41B
AMOM vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMOM vs. IWF commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMOM is a Hold and IWF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 117B vs. AMOM (29.7M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than AMOM: IWF (12.109) vs AMOM (1.211). AMOM was incepted earlier than IWF: AMOM (6 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than AMOM (0.75). AMOM has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| AMOM | IWF | AMOM / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 1.211 | 12.109 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 29.7M | 117B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.18 | 417% |
| Turnover | 354.00 | 13.00 | 2,723% |
| Yield | 0.05 | 0.40 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AMOM | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMOM has been loosely correlated with XYZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMOM jumps, then XYZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMOM | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| XYZ - AMOM | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| DAL - AMOM | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| NOW - AMOM | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.70% | ||
| AXP - AMOM | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
| IDXX - AMOM | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
More | ||||