Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMOM vs IWF
AMOM vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts AMOM vs IWF
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Mmntm ETF
Price$50.90
Change+$0.80 (+1.60%)
Volume$500
Net Assets26.61M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$470.69
Change+$0.56 (+0.12%)
Volume$11.32K
Net Assets122.46B
AMOM vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMOM vs. IWF commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMOM is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 122B vs. AMOM (26.6M). AMOM has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: AMOM (3.070) vs IWF (-0.668). AMOM was incepted earlier than IWF: AMOM (7 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than AMOM (0.75). AMOM has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| AMOM | IWF | AMOM / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 3.070 | -0.668 | -460% |
| Net Assets | 26.6M | 122B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.18 | 417% |
| Turnover | 354.00 | 13.00 | 2,723% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.36 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AMOM | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
AMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMOM has been closely correlated with GEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMOM jumps, then GEV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMOM | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| GEV - AMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| HWM - AMOM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| PLTR - AMOM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| CRWD - AMOM | 67% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| TT - AMOM | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||