It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMNCB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileASBFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMNCB’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ASBFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMNCB (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ASBFY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +2.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +834.71%.
ASBFY is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.
Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
AMNCB | ASBFY | AMNCB / ASBFY | |
Capitalization | 2.14M | 21.2B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -86.403 | 18.956 | -456% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.69 | - |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
AMNCB | ASBFY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASBFY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMNCB (62). This means that ASBFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMNCB’s over the last 12 months.
ASBFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMNCB (100). This means that ASBFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMNCB’s over the last 12 months.
ASBFY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as AMNCB (100). This means that ASBFY’s stock grew similarly to AMNCB’s over the last 12 months.
ASBFY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMNCB (96). This means that ASBFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMNCB’s over the last 12 months.
ASBFY's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as AMNCB (100). This means that ASBFY’s stock grew similarly to AMNCB’s over the last 12 months.
AMNCB | ASBFY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago40% | 4 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago41% | 4 days ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago56% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMNCB and AMNC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMNCB and AMNC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMNCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMNCB | 100% | N/A | ||
AMNC - AMNCB | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ACOPY - AMNCB | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ASBFY - AMNCB | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
ARRT - AMNCB | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ASBFF - AMNCB | 1% Poorly correlated | -4.41% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASBFY and SAPIF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASBFY and SAPIF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASBFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ASBFY | 100% | -0.33% | ||
SAPIF - ASBFY | 24% Poorly correlated | +9.30% | ||
BABB - ASBFY | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.67% | ||
WLMIF - ASBFY | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BYCBF - ASBFY | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BFNH - ASBFY | 11% Poorly correlated | -4.20% | ||
More |