Advertisement
AMNC vs CIADF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMNC is a Hold and CIADF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMNC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCIADF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CIADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- AMNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AMNC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIADF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +834.70%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-0.82% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| AMNC | CIADF | AMNC / CIADF | |
| Capitalization | 2.14M | 8.13B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 105.714 | 68.919 | 153% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 664.16 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
AMNC | CIADF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CIADF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as AMNC (60). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to AMNC’s over the last 12 months.
AMNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (100). This means that AMNC’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.
CIADF's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMNC (100). This means that CIADF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMNC’s over the last 12 months.
AMNC's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (42). This means that AMNC’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.
CIADF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMNC (100). This means that CIADF’s stock grew significantly faster than AMNC’s over the last 12 months.
| AMNC | CIADF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 16% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 20% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
AMNC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMNC and CIADF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMNC and CIADF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMNC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMNC | 100% | N/A | ||
| CIADF - AMNC | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMNCB - AMNC | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACOPF - AMNC | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.85% | ||
| ACOPY - AMNC | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PIFFY - AMNC | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CIADF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIADF has been loosely correlated with PIFFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIADF jumps, then PIFFY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIADF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIADF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PIFFY - CIADF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BOF - CIADF | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
| AMNC - CIADF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LYSFY - CIADF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSYCF - CIADF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||