AMNC
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.72M
CIADF
Price
$2.18
Change
-$0.32 (-12.80%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMNC vs CIADF

Header iconAMNC vs CIADF Comparison
Open Charts AMNC vs CIADFBanner chart's image
Amincor
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization1.72M
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$2.18
Change-$0.32 (-12.80%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization7.51B
AMNC vs CIADF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMNC vs. CIADF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMNC is a Hold and CIADF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AMNC: $0.10 vs. CIADF: $2.18)
Brand notoriety: AMNC and CIADF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMNC: 28% vs. CIADF: 460%
Market capitalization -- AMNC: $1.72M vs. CIADF: $7.51B
AMNC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $1.72M. CIADF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $7.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMNC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCIADF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CIADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIADF is a better buy in the long-term than AMNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIADF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CIADF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMNC is a better buy in the short-term than CIADF.

Price Growth

AMNC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIADF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADF($7.51B) has a higher market cap than AMNC($1.72M). AMNC YTD gains are higher at: 80.357 vs. CIADF (47.297).
AMNCCIADFAMNC / CIADF
Capitalization1.72M7.51B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD80.35747.297170%
P/E RatioN/A515.87-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMNC vs CIADF: Fundamental Ratings
AMNC
CIADF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3593
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92100
SMR RATING
1..100
10055
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIADF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as AMNC (60). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to AMNC’s over the last 12 months.

AMNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (100). This means that AMNC’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMNC (100). This means that CIADF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMNC’s over the last 12 months.

AMNC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (52). This means that AMNC’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMNC (100). This means that CIADF’s stock grew significantly faster than AMNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMNCCIADF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFE2.350.05
+2.17%
New Fortress Energy
GEF61.400.47
+0.77%
Greif
BAP259.98-1.58
-0.60%
Credicorp Ltd
CURR1.68-0.02
-1.18%
Currenc Group Inc
SNGX3.04-0.04
-1.30%
Soligenix Inc.

AMNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMNC and CIADF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMNC and CIADF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMNC
1D Price
Change %
AMNC100%
N/A
CIADF - AMNC
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMNCB - AMNC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACOPF - AMNC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACOPY - AMNC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFFY - AMNC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CIADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIADF has been loosely correlated with PIFFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIADF jumps, then PIFFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADF
1D Price
Change %
CIADF100%
N/A
PIFFY - CIADF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BOF - CIADF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
AMNC - CIADF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSFY - CIADF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYCF - CIADF
24%
Poorly correlated
+14.26%
More