AMN
Price
$18.49
Change
+$0.27 (+1.48%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.35B
19 days until earnings call
USPH
Price
$67.45
Change
-$1.00 (-1.46%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.69B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMN vs USPH

Header iconAMN vs USPH Comparison
Open Charts AMN vs USPHBanner chart's image
AMN Healthcare Services
Price$18.49
Change+$0.27 (+1.48%)
Volume$731.54K
Capitalization2.35B
US Physical Therapy
Price$67.45
Change-$1.00 (-1.46%)
Volume$90.38K
Capitalization1.69B
AMN vs USPH Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMN vs. USPH commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a Hold and USPH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AMN: $18.49 vs. USPH: $67.45)
Brand notoriety: AMN and USPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMN: 66% vs. USPH: 72%
Market capitalization -- AMN: $2.35B vs. USPH: $1.69B
AMN [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $2.35B. USPH’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $1.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSPH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMN and USPH are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USPH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • USPH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USPH is a better buy in the short-term than AMN.

Price Growth

AMN (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -3.90% price change this week, while USPH (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

USPH is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.04% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMN($2.35B) has a higher market cap than USPH($1.69B). USPH has higher P/E ratio than AMN: USPH (87.62) vs AMN (11.59). AMN (-22.701) and USPH (-23.518) have similar YTD gains . AMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 499M vs. USPH (74.4M). USPH has more cash in the bank: 153M vs. AMN (32.9M). USPH has less debt than AMN: USPH (259M) vs AMN (1.35B). AMN has higher revenues than USPH: AMN (3.79B) vs USPH (605M).
AMNUSPHAMN / USPH
Capitalization2.35B1.69B139%
EBITDA499M74.4M671%
Gain YTD-22.701-23.51897%
P/E Ratio11.5987.6213%
Revenue3.79B605M626%
Total Cash32.9M153M22%
Total Debt1.35B259M521%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMN vs USPH: Fundamental Ratings
AMN
USPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5213
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
9482
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9281
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1195
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

USPH's Valuation (25) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMN (67) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that USPH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.

USPH's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as AMN (100) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that USPH’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

USPH's SMR Rating (82) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as AMN (94) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that USPH’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

USPH's Price Growth Rating (81) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as AMN (92) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that USPH’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

AMN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Personnel Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for USPH (95) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew significantly faster than USPH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMNUSPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
SPY526.410.75
+0.14%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla
BTC.X84450.805000-444.945300
-0.52%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

AMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMN has been loosely correlated with AGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMN jumps, then AGL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMN
1D Price
Change %
AMN100%
+1.48%
AGL - AMN
55%
Loosely correlated
-26.87%
CCRN - AMN
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
ASTH - AMN
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
USPH - AMN
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
UHS - AMN
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
More

USPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USPH has been loosely correlated with SEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USPH jumps, then SEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USPH
1D Price
Change %
USPH100%
-1.46%
SEM - USPH
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
NHC - USPH
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
ENSG - USPH
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
EHC - USPH
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
HCSG - USPH
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More