AMN vs UHS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a Hold and UHS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UHS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UHS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AMN (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -3.90% price change this week, while UHS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
UHS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.04% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| AMN | UHS | AMN / UHS | |
| Capitalization | 2.35B | 12.3B | 19% |
| EBITDA | 499M | 1.71B | 29% |
| Gain YTD | -22.701 | -2.464 | 921% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.59 | 17.13 | 68% |
| Revenue | 3.79B | 14.3B | 26% |
| Total Cash | 32.9M | 119M | 28% |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 5.37B | 25% |
AMN | UHS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UHS's Valuation (34) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMN (67) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMN (100) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew significantly faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's SMR Rating (49) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMN (94) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMN (92) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.
AMN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Personnel Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for UHS (82) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew significantly faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.
| AMN | UHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 59% |
AMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMN has been loosely correlated with AGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMN jumps, then AGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMN | 100% | +1.48% | ||
| AGL - AMN | 55% Loosely correlated | -26.87% | ||
| CCRN - AMN | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| ASTH - AMN | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| USPH - AMN | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
| UHS - AMN | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
More | ||||
UHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been closely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.