AMN
Price
$27.58
Change
+$1.74 (+6.73%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.35B
66 days until earnings call
UHS
Price
$180.03
Change
-$4.14 (-2.25%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.26B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMN vs UHS

Header iconAMN vs UHS Comparison
Open Charts AMN vs UHSBanner chart's image
AMN Healthcare Services
Price$27.58
Change+$1.74 (+6.73%)
Volume$2.99M
Capitalization2.35B
Universal Health Services
Price$180.03
Change-$4.14 (-2.25%)
Volume$760.53K
Capitalization12.26B
AMN vs UHS Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMN vs. UHS commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a Hold and UHS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (AMN: $27.58 vs. UHS: $180.03)
Brand notoriety: AMN and UHS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMN: 331% vs. UHS: 140%
Market capitalization -- AMN: $2.35B vs. UHS: $12.26B
AMN [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $2.35B. UHS’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $12.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UHS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UHS is a better buy in the long-term than AMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMN’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMN’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UHS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMN is a better buy in the short-term than UHS.

Price Growth

AMN (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +17.76% price change this week, while UHS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +14.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMN is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

UHS is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+14.19% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UHS($12.3B) has a higher market cap than AMN($2.35B). UHS has higher P/E ratio than AMN: UHS (17.13) vs AMN (11.59). AMN YTD gains are higher at: 15.301 vs. UHS (0.340). UHS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.71B vs. AMN (499M). UHS has more cash in the bank: 119M vs. AMN (32.9M). AMN has less debt than UHS: AMN (1.35B) vs UHS (5.37B). UHS has higher revenues than AMN: UHS (14.3B) vs AMN (3.79B).
AMNUHSAMN / UHS
Capitalization2.35B12.3B19%
EBITDA499M1.71B29%
Gain YTD15.3010.3404,500%
P/E Ratio11.5917.1368%
Revenue3.79B14.3B26%
Total Cash32.9M119M28%
Total Debt1.35B5.37B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMN vs UHS: Fundamental Ratings
AMN
UHS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6713
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
8153
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1386
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UHS's Valuation (34) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMN (72) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.

UHS's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMN (100) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.

UHS's SMR Rating (53) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as AMN (81) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

UHS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as AMN (63) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

AMN's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Personnel Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for UHS (86) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew significantly faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMNUHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

AMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMN has been loosely correlated with CCRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMN jumps, then CCRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMN
1D Price
Change %
AMN100%
+6.73%
CCRN - AMN
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
AGL - AMN
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
ASTH - AMN
42%
Loosely correlated
-4.57%
UHS - AMN
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
INNV - AMN
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
More

UHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been closely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UHS
1D Price
Change %
UHS100%
-2.25%
HCA - UHS
77%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
EHC - UHS
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
THC - UHS
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.57%
SEM - UHS
36%
Loosely correlated
-7.24%
ASTH - UHS
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.57%
More