AMN
Price
$23.08
Change
+$0.14 (+0.61%)
Updated
Dec 23, 03:06 PM (EDT)
52 days until earnings call
UHS
Price
$178.96
Change
-$1.15 (-0.64%)
Updated
Dec 23, 11:57 AM (EDT)
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMN vs UHS

Header iconAMN vs UHS Comparison
Open Charts AMN vs UHSBanner chart's image
AMN Healthcare Services
Price$23.08
Change+$0.14 (+0.61%)
Volume$1.04K
CapitalizationN/A
Universal Health Services
Price$178.96
Change-$1.15 (-0.64%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
AMN vs UHS Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMN vs. UHS commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a Hold and UHS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (AMN: $22.94 vs. UHS: $180.11)
Brand notoriety: AMN and UHS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMN: 207% vs. UHS: 162%
Market capitalization -- AMN: $2.35B vs. UHS: $12.26B
AMN [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $2.35B. UHS’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $12.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UHS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UHS is a better buy in the long-term than AMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UHS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AMN and UHS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AMN (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -15.10% price change this week, while UHS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

UHS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-3.50% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UHS($12.3B) has a higher market cap than AMN($2.35B). UHS has higher P/E ratio than AMN: UHS (17.13) vs AMN (11.59). UHS YTD gains are higher at: 18.640 vs. AMN (-69.364). UHS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.71B vs. AMN (499M). UHS has more cash in the bank: 119M vs. AMN (32.9M). AMN has less debt than UHS: AMN (1.35B) vs UHS (5.37B). UHS has higher revenues than AMN: UHS (14.3B) vs AMN (3.79B).
AMNUHSAMN / UHS
Capitalization2.35B12.3B19%
EBITDA499M1.71B29%
Gain YTD-69.36418.640-372%
P/E Ratio11.5917.1368%
Revenue3.79B14.3B26%
Total Cash32.9M119M28%
Total Debt1.35B5.37B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMN vs UHS: Fundamental Ratings
AMN
UHS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
8153
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1985
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1635

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UHS's Valuation (33) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMN (71) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.

UHS's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMN (100) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.

UHS's SMR Rating (53) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as AMN (81) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

UHS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as AMN (92) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

AMN's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Personnel Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for UHS (85) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew significantly faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMNUHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

AMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMN has been loosely correlated with CCRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMN jumps, then CCRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMN
1D Price
Change %
AMN100%
-0.04%
CCRN - AMN
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
ASTH - AMN
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.96%
AGL - AMN
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.79%
BKD - AMN
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
UHS - AMN
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
More

UHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been closely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UHS
1D Price
Change %
UHS100%
+2.45%
HCA - UHS
75%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
EHC - UHS
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
THC - UHS
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
ASTH - UHS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.96%
SEM - UHS
33%
Loosely correlated
+4.38%
More