AMN vs INNV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a Buy and INNV is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINNV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- INNV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INNV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- INNV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMN (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -41.67% price change this week, while INNV (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -12.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1650.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
INNV is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-3.60% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| AMN | INNV | AMN / INNV | |
| Capitalization | 2.35B | 639M | 368% |
| EBITDA | 499M | -15.45M | -3,229% |
| Gain YTD | -68.122 | -8.833 | 771% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.59 | 36.76 | 32% |
| Revenue | 3.79B | 721M | 526% |
| Total Cash | 32.9M | 98.8M | 33% |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 112M | 1,205% |
AMN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMN | INNV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 0% | 10 days ago 0% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 3 days ago 84% |
AMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMN has been closely correlated with CCRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMN jumps, then CCRN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMN | 100% | -2.97% | ||
| CCRN - AMN | 77% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| ASTH - AMN | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| AGL - AMN | 47% Loosely correlated | -9.04% | ||
| BKD - AMN | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.02% | ||
| INNV - AMN | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||
INNV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that INNV and HCSG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INNV and HCSG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INNV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INNV | 100% | -4.70% | ||
| HCSG - INNV | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| BKD - INNV | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| AMN - INNV | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.71% | ||
| UHS - INNV | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| AVAH - INNV | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||