AMN
Price
$21.00
Change
+$0.46 (+2.24%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
789.02M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CON
Price
$23.04
Change
+$0.23 (+1.01%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMN vs CON

Header iconAMN vs CON Comparison
Open Charts AMN vs CONBanner chart's image
AMN Healthcare Services
Price$21.00
Change+$0.46 (+2.24%)
Volume$100
Capitalization789.02M
Concentra Group Holdings Parent
Price$23.04
Change+$0.23 (+1.01%)
Volume$58.87K
Capitalization2.92B
AMN vs CON Comparison Chart in %
AMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMN vs. CON commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a Hold and CON is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (AMN: $20.54 vs. CON: $22.81)
Brand notoriety: AMN and CON are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMN: 119% vs. CON: 149%
Market capitalization -- AMN: $789.02M vs. CON: $2.92B
AMN [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $789.02M. CON’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $2.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $113.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCON’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CON’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the long-term than AMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CON’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CON’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the short-term than AMN.

Price Growth

AMN (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -1.63% price change this week, while CON (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +5.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.16% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CON($2.92B) has a higher market cap than AMN($789M). CON has higher P/E ratio than AMN: CON (19.50) vs AMN (18.07). AMN YTD gains are higher at: 30.330 vs. CON (15.904). CON has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 394M vs. AMN (-105.3M). AMN has more cash in the bank: 52.6M vs. CON (49.9M). AMN has less debt than CON: AMN (885M) vs CON (2.14B). AMN has higher revenues than CON: AMN (2.72B) vs CON (2.09B).
AMNCONAMN / CON
Capitalization789M2.92B27%
EBITDA-105.3M394M-27%
Gain YTD30.33015.904191%
P/E Ratio18.0719.5093%
Revenue2.72B2.09B130%
Total Cash52.6M49.9M105%
Total Debt885M2.14B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMN: Fundamental Ratings
AMN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMNCON
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FASEX55.300.46
+0.84%
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Opportunities A
JVMSX28.720.10
+0.35%
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
RSSYX26.340.02
+0.08%
Victory RS Select Growth Y
JANRX20.08-0.08
-0.40%
Janus Henderson Global Select D
SPIIX103.78-0.92
-0.88%
SEI S&P 500 Index I (SIMT)

AMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMN has been loosely correlated with CCRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMN jumps, then CCRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMN
1D Price
Change %
AMN100%
-5.48%
CCRN - AMN
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
ASTH - AMN
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.66%
CON - AMN
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
ACHC - AMN
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
ARDT - AMN
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
More

CON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CON has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CON jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CON
1D Price
Change %
CON100%
+2.98%
UHS - CON
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
THC - CON
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.56%
HCA - CON
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
PNTG - CON
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
USPH - CON
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
More