AMN
Price
$19.58
Change
+$4.26 (+27.81%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
588.5M
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CON
Price
$20.43
Change
+$0.15 (+0.74%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.6B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMN vs CON

Header iconAMN vs CON Comparison
Open Charts AMN vs CONBanner chart's image
AMN Healthcare Services
Price$19.58
Change+$4.26 (+27.81%)
Volume$44.89K
Capitalization588.5M
Concentra Group Holdings Parent
Price$20.43
Change+$0.15 (+0.74%)
Volume$8.38K
Capitalization2.6B
AMN vs CON Comparison Chart in %
AMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMN vs. CON commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a Hold and CON is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (AMN: $15.32 vs. CON: $20.28)
Brand notoriety: AMN and CON are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMN: 70% vs. CON: 85%
Market capitalization -- AMN: $588.5M vs. CON: $2.6B
AMN [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $588.5M. CON’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $2.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $109.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCON’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CON’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the long-term than AMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CON’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CON’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMN is a better buy in the short-term than CON.

Price Growth

AMN (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -2.42% price change this week, while CON (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

CON is expected to report earnings on Mar 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+0.21% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CON($2.6B) has a higher market cap than AMN($588M). AMN (18.07) and CON (17.33) have similar P/E ratio . CON YTD gains are higher at: 3.049 vs. AMN (-2.792). CON has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 394M vs. AMN (-105.3M). AMN has more cash in the bank: 52.6M vs. CON (49.9M). AMN has less debt than CON: AMN (885M) vs CON (2.14B). AMN has higher revenues than CON: AMN (2.72B) vs CON (2.09B).
AMNCONAMN / CON
Capitalization588M2.6B23%
EBITDA-105.3M394M-27%
Gain YTD-2.7923.049-92%
P/E Ratio18.0717.33104%
Revenue2.72B2.09B130%
Total Cash52.6M49.9M105%
Total Debt885M2.14B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMN: Fundamental Ratings
AMN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMNCON
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGSMX23.960.04
+0.17%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R6
FIEUX48.25N/A
N/A
Fidelity Europe
GLNIX25.13N/A
N/A
MFS Global New Discovery I
BRSHX14.58-0.06
-0.41%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq C
LSGRX33.59-0.21
-0.62%
Loomis Sayles Growth Y

AMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMN has been loosely correlated with CON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMN jumps, then CON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMN
1D Price
Change %
AMN100%
-2.73%
CON - AMN
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
CCRN - AMN
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
USPH - AMN
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
ACHC - AMN
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.14%
CYH - AMN
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
More

CON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CON has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CON jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CON
1D Price
Change %
CON100%
-1.60%
UHS - CON
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
HCA - CON
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
THC - CON
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
PNTG - CON
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
USPH - CON
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
More