AMLM
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.63M
TWOSF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMLM vs TWOSF

Header iconAMLM vs TWOSF Comparison
Open Charts AMLM vs TWOSFBanner chart's image
American Lithium Minerals
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$27.38K
Capitalization6.63M
T2 METALS
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.75K
Capitalization6.2M
AMLM vs TWOSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMLM vs. TWOSF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMLM is a Hold and TWOSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (AMLM: $0.04 vs. TWOSF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: AMLM and TWOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMLM: 71% vs. TWOSF: 23%
Market capitalization -- AMLM: $6.63M vs. TWOSF: $6.2M
AMLM [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $6.63M. TWOSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTWOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TWOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMLM is a better buy in the long-term than TWOSF.

Price Growth

AMLM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +11.60% price change this week, while TWOSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -44.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMLM($6.63M) has a higher market cap than TWOSF($6.2M). AMLM YTD gains are higher at: 130.488 vs. TWOSF (-56.060). TWOSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.22M vs. AMLM (-5.23M). TWOSF has more cash in the bank: 1.31M vs. AMLM (11.1K). AMLM (0) and TWOSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AMLMTWOSFAMLM / TWOSF
Capitalization6.63M6.2M107%
EBITDA-5.23M-1.22M430%
Gain YTD130.488-56.060-233%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash11.1K1.31M1%
Total Debt864KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMLM vs TWOSF: Fundamental Ratings
AMLM
TWOSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
10096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3897
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10085
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5029

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMLM's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as TWOSF (58). This means that AMLM’s stock grew similarly to TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

AMLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as TWOSF (100). This means that AMLM’s stock grew similarly to TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as AMLM (100). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to AMLM’s over the last 12 months.

AMLM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TWOSF (97). This means that AMLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as AMLM (100). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to AMLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PZG0.620.03
+5.76%
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp
HAL23.191.21
+5.51%
Halliburton Company
HP18.290.30
+1.67%
Helmerich & Payne
AKYA1.23-0.03
-2.38%
Akoya BioSciences
QCRH64.74-1.85
-2.78%
QCR Holdings

AMLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMLM and NGPHF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMLM and NGPHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMLM
1D Price
Change %
AMLM100%
+11.75%
NGPHF - AMLM
21%
Poorly correlated
+11.09%
ALTPF - AMLM
8%
Poorly correlated
+12.67%
AMMCF - AMLM
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECRAF - AMLM
-4%
Poorly correlated
-3.87%
TWOSF - AMLM
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TWOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TWOSF and GUELF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TWOSF and GUELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWOSF
1D Price
Change %
TWOSF100%
N/A
GUELF - TWOSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABAT - TWOSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.65%
FPRGF - TWOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.13%
PGZFF - TWOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
AMYZF - TWOSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-8.61%
More