AMLLF
Price
$18.10
Change
-$1.76 (-8.86%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.84B
LNGPF
Price
$1.14
Change
-$0.57 (-33.33%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMLLF vs LNGPF

Header iconAMLLF vs LNGPF Comparison
Open Charts AMLLF vs LNGPFBanner chart's image
Aeon Mall
Price$18.10
Change-$1.76 (-8.86%)
Volume$214
Capitalization2.84B
Longfor Group Holdings
Price$1.14
Change-$0.57 (-33.33%)
Volume$21.8K
Capitalization16.88B
AMLLF vs LNGPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMLLF vs. LNGPF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMLLF is a Hold and LNGPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AMLLF: $18.10 vs. LNGPF: $1.14)
Brand notoriety: AMLLF and LNGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMLLF: 16% vs. LNGPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AMLLF: $2.84B vs. LNGPF: $16.88B
AMLLF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $2.84B. LNGPF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $16.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMLLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLNGPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMLLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LNGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMLLF is a better buy in the long-term than LNGPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMLLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AMLLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

AMLLF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LNGPF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNGPF($16.9B) has a higher market cap than AMLLF($2.84B). AMLLF has higher P/E ratio than LNGPF: AMLLF (30.21) vs LNGPF (4.25). AMLLF YTD gains are higher at: 32.504 vs. LNGPF (-33.442). AMLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 109B vs. LNGPF (49B). AMLLF has more cash in the bank: 100B vs. LNGPF (84.8B). LNGPF has less debt than AMLLF: LNGPF (208B) vs AMLLF (830B). AMLLF has higher revenues than LNGPF: AMLLF (408B) vs LNGPF (223B).
AMLLFLNGPFAMLLF / LNGPF
Capitalization2.84B16.9B17%
EBITDA109B49B222%
Gain YTD32.504-33.442-97%
P/E Ratio30.214.25711%
Revenue408B223B183%
Total Cash100B84.8B118%
Total Debt830B208B399%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMLLF vs LNGPF: Fundamental Ratings
AMLLF
LNGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
8345
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4480
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1032
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNGPF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as AMLLF (39). This means that LNGPF’s stock grew similarly to AMLLF’s over the last 12 months.

AMLLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNGPF (100). This means that AMLLF’s stock grew significantly faster than LNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNGPF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMLLF (83). This means that LNGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMLLF’s over the last 12 months.

AMLLF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNGPF (80). This means that AMLLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

AMLLF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as LNGPF (32). This means that AMLLF’s stock grew similarly to LNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMLLFLNGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
10%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RICAX62.830.60
+0.96%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R1
GSLAX16.600.13
+0.79%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
MRFOX32.810.20
+0.61%
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity
EKGCX21.260.06
+0.28%
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
JFNCX55.380.03
+0.05%
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences C

AMLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMLLF has been loosely correlated with LNGPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMLLF jumps, then LNGPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMLLF
1D Price
Change %
AMLLF100%
N/A
LNGPF - AMLLF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CNPPF - AMLLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEN - AMLLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAGOF - AMLLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFSUF - AMLLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LNGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNGPF has been loosely correlated with AMLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNGPF jumps, then AMLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNGPF
1D Price
Change %
LNGPF100%
N/A
AMLLF - LNGPF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CAOVF - LNGPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEKE - LNGPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
LLESF - LNGPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEGIF - LNGPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More