Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMKIX vs RNWHX
AMKIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AMKIX vs RNWHX
American Century Emerging Markets I
Price$16.94
Change+$2.07 (+13.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
AMKIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMKIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMKIX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. AMKIX (1.86B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AMKIX: RNWHX (1.25) vs AMKIX (1.19). AMKIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AMKIX (27 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AMKIX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. AMKIX (29.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMKIX: RNWHX (250) vs AMKIX (5000000). AMKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.46 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. AMKIX (10.66).
| AMKIX | RNWHX | AMKIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.72 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.72 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.155 | 6.092 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.25 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.46 | 27.68 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.74 | 43.24 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.66 | 11.69 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.09 | 124.21 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement